Hits harder how? Superior knockout ratio against superior fighters to the ones Eubank fought. Wanna dispute that? Thought not. Moron. Bute was destroyed by the first top fighter he fought. Fine. Eubank should have lost on points on several occasions to people far, far inferior to Bute. Bute's defeat could easily be an anomaly - in fact probably is so. Eubank's bad performances (plural, *****...) show that he was completely and totally unable to deal with certain styles, even when the opponent utilizing the style was laughable. Not anomalies, just a plain exposure of Eubank's many, many, many limitations as a fighter.
Tougher he was, no arguments there. Then again, anyone forced to desperately clinch against Mauricio Amaral can't be indestructable. And if Eubank didn't finish Bute early (and there's no chance of that), Bute's body punching will kill Eubank down the stretch, who's stamina was very lacking.
Benn would do nothing apart from get stopped. Benn's power at 168 = mediocre. The amount of effort he put into his punches at 168 was in no way proportional to the power in them.
:rofl Hey Butard, you might wanna take your ***** out of Butes Bootay. Bootay is garbage. He was Froch's easiest ever fight. Bootay is a bum plain and simp he has no chin, none. Eubank Jr probably stops him and he has no power, none. That's how disgraceful Bootays cheen is
When we look though, you are doing exactly the same ****. Who said Joe was the second coming? either quote people or STFU. You are rating Froch higher merely based on the fact that he fought Americans, which is what you guys do...... All the ****ing time.... Having witnessed both in there prime and been to both fighters fights, I think Eubank would batter Bute, and would make a great fight with Froch, with Froch outworking the often negative and lazy Eubank to a Split or ud. To have Bute beating Eubank displays the single ****ing reason why I rarely visit the General Forum, it is full of dick heads who know NOTHING about boxing. :hi:
It's clear that you're somewhat mentally handicapped, so I will not address you any more. It's not fair on me to pick on people with difficulties like yours.
You clearly have not seen much of Eubank, because if you had, you wouldn't be talking about him as if he was more than a glorified European/Intercontinental Champion.