Lucian Bute vs Kelly Pavlik

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Mar 18, 2009.


  1. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Yeah. ONE exception proves every other case. :patsch
     
  2. campan

    campan New Member Full Member

    38
    0
    Jan 7, 2006
    pavlik would get his first ko loss
     
  3. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    PAv's fans will say PAv beats Bute, and Bute beats AA. Phonies lol.
     
  4. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008

    The exception showed what kind of boxer can make it hard for Pavlik. It's a question of footwork, of Bute being a southpaw and a slicker boxer than Pavlik. Bute is not Hopkins of course. But Pavlik has not been very impressive over 160, and I'm talking also of the rematch against Taylor. He's slower and his power and strenght become average against big SMW. I think Pavlik would win against Abraham, but not against Bute. So, it is not one exception who proves every other case but THIS case.
     
  5. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Bute would touch him and run away, touch and run away... That's what he does when facing a real puncher..

    Kelly ****s him up.
     
  6. Paulie

    Paulie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,049
    0
    Oct 15, 2007
    Bute by easy T.K.O.
     
  7. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    You bet -- cuz Pavlik has been knocked out so many times -- right:patsch