Lucian Bute why ???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rocky1, Dec 7, 2010.


  1. rocky1

    rocky1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,564
    1
    Oct 26, 2010
    Ok I have seen a few people on here who have Bute ranked number 1 at smw and i would like to know why.....
    So this is just me asking anyone who has bute ranked 1 to explain yourself as i just dont see why some people think he is so great
     
  2. VecArrow

    VecArrow Custom User Title Full Member

    6,776
    3
    Apr 23, 2010
    He can't lose when he has a referee of choice.
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    He dominates his opponents, many of them top10 according to ring magazine.

    for me
    1. Ward
    2. Bute
    3. Froch
     
  4. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    lol
     
  5. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    I had Bute #1 until recently, but I suspect other poeple's rationales were similar to mine. While he doesn't have a true marquee win (frankly, neither does Carl Froch, but that's a different story), he's 6-0 against guys ranked in the SMW top 10 (Andrade x2, Bika, Berrio, Zuniga and Brinkley) and he's generally been impressive in beating them. He beat Bika more dominantly than Calzaghe or Ward, for instance. The only close call was against Andrade, which was just that - a close call. If the fight was 15 seconds longer, he would have lost, but you can say that about a lot of fights. That, and he hasn't lost. If he had lost, obviously he would have dropped, but there's a lot of attrition involved on these lists as well.
     
  6. decapitor

    decapitor Guest

    because he kod miranda when ward couldnt. 1 bute 2 ward
     
  7. harvinmagler

    harvinmagler Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,297
    0
    Nov 26, 2009
    Me neither, he has done **** all to justify being anywhere near the top 5
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    You can't rate him that way on recent resume. I think performance, consistency, seniority get him put there basically, by some. He's been champion uninterrupted longer than anyone else, technically.
     
  9. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    i got him at number 5.he aint fought knowbody worth damn.
     
  10. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,931
    11
    Feb 26, 2005
    The Pikey from Romania fights over the hill dudes for the most part and always in his adapted home town .He will get smacked around when the boys from the Super 6 get around to him.
    Vastly over rated.
     
  11. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    It's b/c of how dominant he has been, not only has he not lost any fights, he has barely lost any rounds, except the last round in the first fight with Andrade.
     
  12. rocky1

    rocky1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,564
    1
    Oct 26, 2010
    really if that's your excuse that is pretty weak

    so by your logic mosley is better than pacquiao as he finished margo

    and vince phillips is better than zab judah and julio cesar chavez
     
  13. harvinmagler

    harvinmagler Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,297
    0
    Nov 26, 2009
    Wow give him a badge, he's not fought anyone of note.
     
  14. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Being dominant to B level fighters is good, but not good enough to be #1. Obviously he is very talented he reminds me abit of Oscar he has looks and has an exciting style, but he is flawed and once he takes on the A level fighters he will get beaten. I think he is an elite at the moment, but no way is he #1. Just because Ward looked shitty in his last fight doesn't erase the fact he beat the Super 6 favorite. Just like Bute had a bad night in his first fight with Andrade then Ward also has an excuse to have one with Bika.

    1. Ward
    2. Froch
    3. Dirrell
    4. Bute
    5. Johnson
     
  15. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    How many people ranked JC #1 SMW somewhere between 1997 to 2006, or even all throughout, before he fought Lacy/Kessler? Quite a few. What was Calzaghe's signature win at the time? Eubank who had already been beaten twice by Collins? Reid? Just putting things in perspective, in case the S6 winner becomes Bute's Kessler (re: JC)........

    I see you included a lot of meat in your statement to back that up... :think

    How about "**** 'em S6 ***gots, Bute's gonna wipe them all out after the tourney is over!!" - same level of objectiveness. :p