Lucian Bute why ???

:bart Not even I ffs . He should fight someone good in his next fight. Better drag Dirrell's ass out of retirement.

 

Frochette's R much worst than Butette's :rofl

 

Frochette take you long to come up with that huh:huh

 

No... You where my inspiration. :rofl

 

Butette actually suits Bute:yep Cobralyte's suits Froch fans best.

 

I put him 3rd. Moron.

You are the biased one, the Frochette, attacking Bute to secure your baby's number one place.

 

Again Butette's so weak can't come up with a decent name For Froch fans so they just copy.

Im biased atschI dont even rank Froch at 1, but i do have Froch and Kessler ahead of Bute

 

Frochette exits since almost 2 years.

Again you failed.

 

Funny that :roll:

 

No. Marty Feldman suits better.:rofl

This content is protected

BTW, I actually like Froch, I just hate morons like you.

 

well after reading this whole thread its clear to me that artful-of-**** is just that, full of ****, its clear to see he is a young child, and jealous that the ppl who control the sport rate bute ahead of croch



hey artful-of-****, how old are you? 23?....25? you gotta know how to tie your whoes before you can call whats what in boxing

 

Im a moron how? I actually think Bute is 1 or 2 most skillful 168 out there, But when you get moronic ****s trying to defend Bute saying he is #1 which the thread starter was asking, its pretty hilarious

 

Theeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere it is!!!!!!!!! That's your ****in problem!!!!

We never did. We justified his presence in everyone's top 3... damn, did I say I had Ward/Bute/Froch on the 2nd or 3rd page? Can't remember.

Oh, and that's when I initiated his purposely biased, purposely exaggerated defense as potential #1. Said I wasn't serious, from the start. BTW, would you say Kessler was the SMW king before the S6 started? Ward dominated him, Froch got outboxed in a close one. How could you make an argument for Froch being #1, even from a biased perspective?!?? I couldn't. And here, I was able to do just that with the #2. Froch is top 3, granted, but lacks the skills of a true king. :good

Your anti-Bute raid in this thread confirms your bias as one of Froch's dumbest defenders.

Have a good day :hi:

 

Stop trying to flirt with me ***, and are you seriously asking me how old I am when you can't speak English atsch

People who control the sport can rate Bute ahead of Froch If they want, let me ask you do you think Bute's wins over Andrade, Bika, Zuniga, Miranda and Brinkley merit Rating him higher than Froch who has wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell and Abraham :huh

 

i rate fighters on skills, not paper....

but to answer your question, bute is rated higher that froch because....he has defended his title more times than froch did, has won more rounds than froch(in career), and has never lost....bute has a 81% ko rate, froch has a 71% ko rate......for these "paper"reasons i would rate bute ahead of froch...

but on skills alone and h2h i would say bute is ahead of froch...froch is a one dimentional fighter(like kessler) who is just learning how to move in the ring(abraham fight)