Luis Collazo is knocking that fraud spark out tonight. - Lifetime bet

Idiot, Khan was NEVER in trouble.

 

The hate on this thread is strong looool

 

I question if u watched the fight at all? Can it be? Collazo landed a short right hand in the 8th that twisted Khan's neck 180 degrees. Took out his legs from underneath him, he was staggering around trying to avoid punches and took a big left hook as well. He desperately hung on to Collazo and that was when the point was deducted for excessive holding. Khan was badly hurt.
Did you guys watch the fight?!

And by watching i don't mean some shitty stream at 360x240 resolution...

 

lol at took out his legs from underneath him...

you clearly watched the stream in 180 X 120 resolution... legs being gone are that in the garcia fight... Khan's legs looked fine in the 8th round when he took that shot around 1.10 and he came back in round 10 to drop him multiple times

 

Nah mate was watching on HD sitting a few feet away.

Be happy he won, but don't deny he was hurt as that borders on insanity.

**** why argue this I don't even understand...

This is an excerpt of a few roundbyrounds of rd8:

"They trade right hands, but Collazo's left hand shakes Khan" - ringtv

"Two right hands by Khan. Collazo clips him with a left and right hand and it seems to have shaken Khan. Collazo is all over him as Khan backs away. Hard left hook by Collazo and Khan clinches. Drakulich takes a point away from Khan for repeated clinching. Collazo fires off three more hard shots at the bell" - sherdog

"But it was in that same round when Khan showed some of his old vulnerabilities after being hurt by Collazo and then penalised a point for holding." - skysports

 

Exactly those comments justify my point... No where does it say his legs were gone or he was hurt bad, etc. That's my point... He took the shot better than before.. To say he was out in his feet is laughable

 

So why was he clinching on and holding on for dear life after being warned literally seconds earlier? WHY risk a deduction? Cause he was hurt as ****, and needed the timeout to get his bearings back.

 

Khan for the most part made Collazo look like a joke. Knocking him down left and right - a total mismatch.
The very short moments where Collazo offered some adversity Khan hung on like anyone should and then continued to own Collazo.

Let this thread stand as a hard lesson to all Khan naysayers. Talk **** and you may end up out for life. Goodbye.

 

:hi:

 

what did mayweather do when clocked by mosley ?

 

"Holding on for dear life"? Wow Calm down he was just wisely trying to buy himself a few extra seconds cause he got buzzed a little with a good shot. A few seconds later he was back to business as usual. It wasn't a big deal and happens all the time. It was just bad timing for Khan as he was warned for holding a few moments earlier.

 

jesus that's not the point the point is he was hurt which is seemingly being denied by blind fans. and we all know khan's history of getting hurt.
honestly i can't be bothered by this anymore

 

But what's the point then? He was caught but he handled it very well and recovered quickly. Collazo is the one who found himself on the floor multiple times. I guess you are just agreeing in your own way that Khan did an excellent job especially "considering his history".

 

no one is denying that he was buzzed

but you said yourself that his legs were gone which is not true.. only disputing that

 

watch the round back again.
he stumbled at one point didnt he?
also when the the ref was docking his point his knees seemed to lock.
both signs that his legs weren't quite there. but i guess it isn't "true" wtf? or is it more that it " can't " be true...