Just no. Look at his record, it's wank. The only case for Collazo being half decent is the fact people say ' what if ' or ' but '. I don't care if he looked good in either the Berto or Hatton fight, he lost both.
A) collazzo lost both those fights....he gave berto the final two rds...when it was time in the CHAMPIONSHIP rds to step it up BERTO did... B) Berto is not DUCKING colazzo...I laugh so hard when people say this...if u work, whatever ur profession u want to make money and be set as much as u can for life....why on earth ould he fight collazzo now and not mosely for unification and big money...it makes no sense...if he beats mosely the sky is the limit....then he can fight collazzo...just because luis had two close fights, one with a green berto and one with a sucky 147 lb hatton does not mean he is some kind of superman...it means he is a good boxer....i would much rather see berto mosely...let collazzo fight the winner down the road
so it obviously could of went either way...I had both berto and hatton winning by two rds...both close both colazzo losses....and by the way how are people compliaining he gets no big fights...he has fought JA RIVERA for the tilte, a nice win then got hatton, mosely, and berto...how is that not big fights?
^ yeah you can't score a fight 114-113 and call robbery, lol **if Collazo was beating Berto pillar to post, scored 2 knockdowns and lost 116-111 aight complain about it but unofficially beating someone means jack he lost to Hatton, Berto and Mosley.... and those were his shots at the big names
I thought he may of edged Hatton. He had him badly hurt at the end aswell. I thought he lost to Berto, I scored it 114-113 - 7-5 with the ridiculous point deduction. I accept that I could go either way though, it was close. What I don't except is anybody calling it a clear win for Berto or a robbery against Collazo.