Lupe Pintor vs Rafael Marquez

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fedor Em, Feb 18, 2009.


  1. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    This would have been a great bantamweight fight. Lupe had a great lead left hook to the body and would use that to open up combination punches upstairs. This could spell trouble for Marquez because as Vasquez showed Marquez can be vulernable to a great hook. Could his chin hold up against Pintor who had very good power at 118? I think so. Marquez is a strong fighter with big heart at bantamweight.

    Marquez would have the height and reach advantage and would be able to use the jab to setup right hands that could have found their mark. I think Marquez had a little more mustard on his shots than Pintor and remember he is no slouch when going to the body which he would need to do. Pintor is the more durable fighter and I don't think Marquez would KO Pintor by headhunting.

    Result

    Marquez UD but he might be dropped in this fight and it would be a very close contest. This would have been a good one.
     
  2. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    93
    Aug 21, 2008
    Very tough fight to call. It basically pits Pintor's toughness, pressure, and short, precise punching vs. Marquez's better all-around ability and harder punching.

    I think Marquez's combined power and boxing ability might see him through, but I could easily see it going the other way.
     
  3. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    I think Pintor knocks him out sometime after the 6th in an exciting scrap.

    I've never been as impressed as a lot of others have with rafael's ability however, despite liking him a lot as a fighter.I think he's too easy to hit here.
     
  4. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    He is a fine boxer/puncher who has beaten 3 great fighters. 2 of them at Pintors best weight. Last year Marquez was very close to being recognized as one of the 5 greatest fighters in the world again.

    When was the last time he was seriously hurt at 118? Pintor had great power but that power is difficult to carry at the lower weights. I would say Vazquez hit harder than Pintor did.

    Many bantamweights have trouble moving up in weight and taking the title. Marquez did it but lost it in the next fight with Vazquez. Pintor failed to do it against Gomez. I think we just have to look at their body of work at 118.
     
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I voted for Rafael, only on a whim though, it will be hotly contested no doubt, Pintor was quite skilled, as the bout with Zarate shows, one of the best and prolific offensive bantams ever and in the rounds the shorter Pintor won he was quite evasive and technically not bad at all. Maybe i picked the wrong guy!

    When i voted i just thought that Marquez is versatile and haate when the going tough, desire for him could get it down the stretch. I did also score the big one of Pintor's for Zarate, but it could have went either way.
     
  6. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    Pintor was a level above IMO. I agree with Mantequilla's take, as usual.
     
  7. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,318
    18,851
    Jul 29, 2004
    Lupe without a doubt IMO...I dont consider Marquez on the same tier as Pintor in a H2H sense and probably not on resume either. I really like Rafa, whats not to like about him? but he gets put on a pedestal by a suprising amount of people.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I was actually impressed with his effectiveness at the weight, i dont want that to get taken out of context or anything.
     
  9. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Yeah that happens when you beat multiple great fighters.

    I wouldn't have suggested such a matchup if I didn't think Marquez had a great chance to win this fight with both at their best. He is a live underdog and this might be a 50/50 fight. He has the size, power, better jab, and a better right hand than Pintor did.
     
  10. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,318
    18,851
    Jul 29, 2004

    Like who?

    Johnson had no place at bantam..Raf looked like he outweighed him by 20 pounds come fight time.
    Austin?..Meh.

    And Izzy gets put up on the same pedestal..They are both just not as good as people try to make out.

    His resume at the moment is kinda thin compared to Pintor's. I truly struggle to see how he was p4p material come into the Vazquez trilogy.
     
  11. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004

    As i said, i do like Marquez, but he was a notch or two below lupe imo.Not meant as a dig at him at all.
     
  12. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Austin was a great fighter, not Pintor great but he was still world class.

    Johnson filled out nicely as a Bantamweight. Marquez looks bigger than Vazquez too at first glance but you know that is not the case. He is a tall, lanky man.

    Vazquez isn't Morales or Gomez and he might be overrated slightly but he is the best around today. You can't take that away from him.

    I am sorry if you can't see how he was p4p material. He lined them all up at 118 and beat them convincingly. That is all you can do. His resmue looks very similar to Pintors and he did what Pintor couldn't do. Win the championship at Superbantamweight.
     
  13. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,318
    18,851
    Jul 29, 2004

    Well Lupe did win a title at superbantam past his prime against a guy who wasnt all that inferior to Izzy.

    I think Lupe's resume is clearly better at bantam. The fact he beat Zarate should end the the discussion but if you want some other names Davilla and Hoon Lee certainly add weight to the arguement.

    Johnson looked shite at bantam..He moved back down to 115 after the two Marquez fights and looked less shite but not near his flyweight form.

    I dont think Rafa lined them all up at bantam..He didnt unify, up until Raf beat Chapo I thought Sahaprom was more accomplished and a better fighter H2H.

    He was more well known than the other bantams around at the time but there were probably several guys with similar records in other divisions. So if Rafa was p4p then why not them? I admit his very good ability brought him up the ladder somewhat, but there were other guys around just about as good but they werent considered p4p material because they didnt have the profile.

    My position seems pretty similar to Mantequilla's..I like Marquez, Im not trying to have a go at him or diminish his achievements..I just think Pintor is better and I think this is fairly evident.
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    Pintor on PTS in a fight where both guys hit the deck but Pintor wins most of the rounds where they are both standing.

    Over 15, Pintor by K.O.
     
  15. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    I stand corrected I forgot about Meza who by your own admission was no Vazquez. I was thinking Pintor only had 1 more title fight and got beat by the asian that lost to Fenech I can't think of his name offhand it has been a while.

    I will give you that Zarate was boss for sure. That was a dead even fight that could have gone either way. Same with Davilla another great fight that was tough to score.

    Hoon Lee a better win than Mabuza? I don't think so. Hoon Lee was better at 122

    Pintor also struggled with Owen and Rengifo for a while until he turned the fight around with his power and finally got the kayo.

    The more I think about it the more Marquez compares very well to Pintor.

    I know Marquez is being compared to a champion that fought in the 70's and 80's. That alone creates a bias against him by some boxing historians but checking out film, their performances, and resmue these are evenly matched ATG fighters.

    No way does Marquez give Gomez a fight like Pintor did though.