I agree with when you say that Enzo would have got the stoppage but, as brutal as it sounds, that's what the fans pay to see. They don't want to see the referee jump in before anyone gets hurt, they want to see genuine knockouts. That shouldn't be interpreted as me arguing that the referee should let a guy get hit despite being completely out of it, like the guy who quoted Michael Watson, because nobody wants to see that, however, there has to be common sense. It gives the fighter who is dominating the chance to get a legitimate stoppage, the opponent a chance to fight back and the fans what they want to see - a fight!
I agree Jack, I think the fight was stopped too early but, ignoring the "ropes" argument, the right thing for the ref to have done was to have just let Enzo have longer at him so there was no dispute over whether Marosi was finished.
Just seen the Buglioni fight, impressive! We could have a genuine heavy-handed prospect on our hands. You'd back him to take Jeffries :hey
totally agree ishy,the 1st few punchs and morby looked gone,and jeffers and anderson dident do that:good
look mate,i don't know who you are,maybe you have boxed and really think you are it:thinkbut it should of been let to go on,yes,he was ready for going,his legs were going,but ive seen boxers a lot lot more ****ed that him,and let go on,khan springs to mind ala prescott,the boy was ****ed,absulutly ****ed,he was sucking eggs,but was let go on. and the watson thing you just brought up,stop being a ****ing ****,thousands of boxers world wide every week box,and only a handfull per decade get hurt,so stop bringing **** up,its not only hurtfull to the sport but ****ing disrespectful:deal