Macklin-yebes this weekend.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by lencoreastside, Sep 24, 2014.


  1. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,013
    Dec 27, 2010
    I didn't see the fight, but it is hard to argue against so many strong negative reports from proven knowledgeable posters.

    Unless inactivity and lack of fitness( both of which can be fixed) played a part....???
     
  2. Txomo

    Txomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,194
    130
    Jul 19, 2012
    I watched it a couple of days ago on Youtube. It was easy to see that Macklin is a couple of levels above Yebes but he failed at getting the control of the fight. He fought well at bursts but was not able to command. He had the better footwork, fastest hands, more power, but it lacked the will... he was getting hit too many times by a C class man.

    Maybe it was just ring rust... but looked like something was missing there... maybe just bad shape... maybe lack of motivation...

    I like Macklin but i've never been high on him since he fought Rubén Varon. All this **** around MGM marbella, jamie moore, kavanagh... does not look a good thing for Macklin.
     
  3. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    I agree with this. Also I take back my previous post when I said I thought he was 50 50 with both Cotto and Murray. He'd been inactive for 6 months after losing to GOLOVKIN. But it gies without saying that he took a pasting. Then 9 months between Lamar Russ and Yebes. But he performed well against Russ,who was,in my opinion,far better than Yebes,not to mention a lot younger. That last fight might just be the turning point in his career. No comparison with the boxer who went even steven with Sturm,whatever the decision. Maybe he's just gone over the top,maybe its running his own gym. Maybe George Groves should take note.
     
  4. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    I agree with you here also.
     
  5. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,013
    Dec 27, 2010
    Just watched the fight now. Perhaps it's because I had such low expectations that he would look awful, but actually I didn't think Mack was all THAT poor.

    Certainly not so bad that I would rule him out just yet. He was clearly better that Yebes and should have won widely IMO ...the sky commentator said as much before the scores were announced too. The scores were wrong IMO ...
    Certainly no worse than, for example, than Murray looked against Khomitsky.
     
  6. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,013
    Dec 27, 2010
    I don't!
     
  7. antonio plaisir

    antonio plaisir the detonator Full Member

    7,061
    3
    Nov 30, 2012
    how much do we factor in well-publicized distractions in preparation?
     
  8. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,013
    Dec 27, 2010
    Good point.
    When you consider that Macklin has been hopelessly inactive, the "distractions" plus his long history of making hard work of low-level opponents he was"supposed"to beat easily, I don't think Mack was all THAT bad at all!

    It's not as if the likes of Mirray and Lee look great in ever fight themselves!

    Give the guy a chance....
     
  9. Txomo

    Txomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,194
    130
    Jul 19, 2012
    It was not impossible to give Yebes three rds... 77-75. I agree Macklin won, but he was not solid. It seemed that he lacked the willigness to go forward and smash that part-time-boxer...:huh