Just how I think it will go. Maidana has a tricky style for Khan imo. He's a better inside puncher and on the scales he seemd bigger than people made him out to be. Khan's left bicep seemed huge compared to his right, maybe he plans to jab and run a lot? What I do think though is that he looked the more scared (just my opinion). I personaly think is that Roach is great but a bit over rated at the minute and Maidana has done well to talk no trash because Freddie is great at mind games. People forget that the boxing oracle changed his mind at the last minute and said Pac was going to take a close decision against Hatton but still takes credit for the early KO prediction. As for B-Hop I fancey him to take a wide UD or to win by DQ. I think Pascal is a glorified gate keeper who has one big win against an inconsistant fighter (and even that does not sound conclusive) I just can't Pascal out boxing him, he has too low of a work rate to out work him and he'll never KO him.
I'm putting money on B-Hop. Khan Maidana will be a good scrap but Maidana is a style nightmare for him.
I would like for Maidana and Hops to win. But my brain is telling me Khan Ud, my heart says Maidana KO5. And I believe Hops will get the decision over Pascal. I don't wanna see Pascal lose, I like the guy, but I just think Hops will pull out the upset yet again.
I see Khan as having twice the chance to win because I think he is the only guy who can win a decision in this match. And he's also capable of winning by knockout. Whereas Maidana can only win by knockout, though he has as good a chance as anybody to do it, given his heavy hands and Amir's shaky beard. BHOP has very little chance, imo. He has almost no chance to win by knockout because he hasn't knocked anyone out in six years, let alone a top light heavy that has never been stopped. And at his age out-pointing a young speedy fighter IN HIS BACKYARD on the cards...terribly tough match-up for him that I will kiss his ass shamelessly for winning if he can do it at this age.
The fact Hopkins is taking this fight tells us one thing for sure; he knows how to beat Pascal. Whether he still has sharp enough tools in the box to carry out his gameplan, remains to be seen. I think Pascal is being over-rated a bit now. I think Dawson would beat him in a rematch if he comes in at his best and lets his hands go. Pascal got out-boxed by Froch afterall and I think his 'significant' improvements at 175 are being smoke-screened a bit by that Dawson fight. I don't think he's going to find it easy to counter or flurry in-and-out against Hopkins. I expect Hopkins to establish the timing on his jab that will prevent Pascal from stepping in with flurries all the time and counter him when he does step in, aswell as joining him inside, initiating clinches and trying to take away his foot-speed with subtle bodywork.
I'm not overrating Pascal, but I saw BHOP/RJJ II... Frankly, BHOP I'm sure "knew how to beat Calzaghe" also, but it didn't work. You don't have to out-box a man in his late forties. You don't have to have effective aggression, as the Calzaghe fight demonstrated. You just have to do more. And the likelihood that Pascal will simply do more, even if it's not particularly impressive-looking (as it often isn't against BHOP), it will more than likely get him the W in his own backyward. I do think Dawson SHOULD have and COULD have beaten Pascal and I have the same opinion about a rematch, but he didn't and might not if they fought again. That seemed more like a mental glitch from Dawson to me than Pascal doing anything unbelievable and great. Although, I like Pascal, yeah, he may get overrated or whatever.