Imo Eubank lost against BJS due to a lack of experience. He started slow but once he got going he was winning the fight. And I think both he and BJS beat Lemiux who is a solid fighter but not world class as shown in his defeats to the likes of Rubio and Alcine.
A loss is a loss.:good Saunders was 20-0 and Jr was 18-0 when they fought, so the gap in experience wasn't too big.
Very true but BJS had fought a much higher level of opposition. I know who I'd be backing in a rematch. :deal
1. Golovkin 2. Saunders 3. Jacobs 4. Lemieux 5. Lee No way it's Eubank Jr. Lee's win over Korobov is better than anything Eubank Jr. has done as of yet.
Eubank Jr. doesn't have the resume to be ranked over Lee or Lemieux. I wouldn't even rank him above Quillin, N'Dam, or Heiland. 1. Golovkin 2. Saunders 3. Jacobs 4. Lemieux 5. Lee 6. Quillin 7. N'Dam 8. Heiland 9. Eubank Jr. 10. Khurtsidze Khurtsidze's win over Douglas is good, but I think Eubank Jr. has a bit more depth to his resume. The Douglas win might grow overtime, and if it does, I'd have Khurtsidze over Heiland and Eubank Jr. N'Dam's wins over Stevens and Khurtsidze also grew.
If people are seriously ranking Eubank Jr. over him, then yes. Lemieux has a very good win over N'Dam right after N'Dam beat Stevens. Lemieux can't be anything lower than #4 after Golovkin, Saunders, and Jacobs. Jacobs has a very good win over Quillin, but nothing before. Saunders has a lot more depth to his resume with wins over Eubank Jr., Lee, undefeated O'Sullivan, undefeated Fletcher, and once beaten Blackwell.