Make the best case possible for Marquez not winning a single fight against Pacquiao

All close fights. I thought Marquez performed amazingly in all 3. He looked best in the second fight i felt. I scored the first a draw, the second to Pac by a point, the third i am yet to score but i remember thinking it was close when the final bell rang

 

Pac clearly won the 1st fight so no need to debate that one.

The 2nd fight I had a 114-114 draw (and that was me scoring a round 10-10 that the majority of people seem to have given to Pacquiao).

The 3rd I can never decide if it was a draw or to Pac by a point.

No, I don't believe Marquez won any of the fights, same as the judges.

People way, way, way misinterpret the 3rd fight simply because Pac was supposed to demolish Marquez. Anyone who doesn't have that fight close as hell is incapable of scoring purely objectively, and removing who the fighters are and what the circumstances are from their thinking/judging.

 

I had all 3 to JMM. fabulously gifted boxer.

 

There is no such credible case... only complete bias or out & out lying or trolling can try make such a case.

End of.

 

Thats ****in ridiculous... Marquez clearly won the 2nd & 3rd fights :verysad

 

atsch You are not objective. You cannot divorce who they are and what their history is and what the circumstances are from the cold, hard evidence of the fight film.

 

I scored the first two for Pac honestly. If I go by what the *******s say about the 3rd, then Pac was the busier fighter and Marquez eased up by the 9th and Pac won the last 3 or 4 rounds and you can't do that in a close fight.


Watch it in slow mo if you don't believe me.........

 

The same dudes that say JMM was robbed against Pac in the third fight.

Are the same dudes that have Bradley beating Pac.

Conclusion these ***s dont have a clue how to score a fight.

Or are agenda having dont know **** about the sport nuccas.