Malignaggi, Collazo, Diaz, Lazcano: "Pacquiao Will Beat Hatton"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Apr 10, 2009.


  1. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    :lol: So true
     
  2. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    12 out of 15 UK experts picked Witter over Bradely.
     
  3. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008

    Witter would slam Bradley in a rematch, he had **** going on pre-fight, the guys a bum.
     
  4. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    It's really all just speculation brah.....from the surface...yeah...DLH looked terrible. He looked to be slower, but if you are fighting a faster fighter that's what happens. DLH looked like he wasn't punching aside from the initial first round, but that could have everything to do with PAC countering him with superior speed and DLH having to think twice before pulling the trigger. Or you could be right...DLH wasn't DLH that we all saw in the Forbes and Mayweather fights. So I'm sure if Hatton looses in a one sided fashion it will all be due to the fact that "it wasn't the same Ricky Hatton that showed up for the fights he won against Paulie and KT".
     
  5. Cholo

    Cholo Guest

    and you´re a fat clown.


    This content is protected
     
  6. Nope..... De La Hoya was just shot.... nothing more nothing less
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Well I can't really comment on what "excuses" other people are going to give, can I? Hatton has been at 140 all his career and is still near the top of his game, if Pac wins it'll be a very, very good win for win and he'll get full credit from me.

    The Oscar fight is speculation as you say, but thats my take on it. Pac fought well and his speed and movement were certainly a major factor in the win, but so was Oscars condition.
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    and hatton even turned down a fight against that shot DLH and preferred a not so shot malignaggi.
     
  9. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Yes, he did.
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Yep, he missed the boat on that one.
     
  11. larrysmith

    larrysmith Guest

    i wonder why..lazcano,collazo and paulie got beat by hatton...and diaz must be in love with pacman...damn he's obsessed
     
  12. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Speculation.....No one knows what the determining factor was in the win for PAC. But That's TWO guys who PAC made look like that within a years time. And BOTH of the men who lost to PAC had very GOOD wins and performances within a years time. AND No one had ever made DLH nor Diaz look as "SHOT" as they did against Manny. So Hatton might very well be "SHOT" too should PAC put on anther dominating and one sided performance on May 2nd.
     
  13. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I won't argue that...DLH looked like he was shot. But I want to wait and see how PAC perfroms against Hatton to make a judgement call on the performance he had against Oscar.
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    bottomline here is, hatton doesn't have the confidence to fight DLH back then. people easily branded DLH as shot and/or weight-drained in hindsight but at the back of hatton's mind; here is a guy who almost beat floyd while i have a hell of a time with him.
     
  15. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    Suprised so many favour Pac. Really close call IMO. I could see either winning but **** the experts, Hatton by stoppage.