Malignaggi says Broner doesn't compare to Cotto, Khan

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Jun 23, 2013.


  1. FIN

    FIN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,865
    1
    Mar 13, 2010
    If u watch the fight he won atleast 2 rounds,i dont really go by scorecards,either way he was outclassed by both,he should give Ricky credit who beat him easily..
     
  2. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    I did watch the fight and the majority of people gave him no rounds.

    He should- he has nothing against Hatton but says he got so much wrong in the preparation for that fight he beat himself and has no idea how good Hatton really is, whereas Khan he knows was on a different level. In fairness he does come across as being honest
     
  3. FIN

    FIN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,865
    1
    Mar 13, 2010
    I do think he's being honest but no version of Paulie beats Hatton..
     
  4. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    8
    Sep 21, 2008
    Broner looked way too small to compete at 147 at this point in his career. I think he should stay at 135 or 140 until his body grows into the higher weight classes. Definitely doesn't have the same pop at 147 as he did at 130-135, however Malignaggi takes a great shot. I just hope Broner makes good on his word to fight who the fans want him to fight...would love to see Mattyse throw him a serious beating
     
  5. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    How so- he was claerly bigger than Paulie, and his walking around weight is much bigger than most Welters. There's a picture of him between fights stood with Quillin and Trout if I remember rightly and he is bigger than them 2.
     
  6. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    He's right Broner will be way better than them.
     
  7. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Cotto, Kahn and Hatton all handled Paulie with much more ease than Broner did.

    Broner has a lot of talent, but I was NOT impressed with him in this fight. He's also the biggest ****ing douchebag in the sport. No class, no charisma, he's not funny, he says the dumbest **** I've ever heard from a fighter, and he struggled to beat a guy that any elite fighter should steamroll like Kahn, Cotto and Hatton did.
     
  8. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,690
    Mar 18, 2012
    Khan would kill broner.
     
  9. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    With a gun not boxing.
     
  10. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,690
    Mar 18, 2012
    He would K.O broner with a body shot easily. Not even in the same class of fighters, Khan is B level broner is C level.
     
  11. Godhead

    Godhead Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,649
    21
    Jan 26, 2010
    Nobody at 32 is past their prime idiot, unless they had some kind of injury. Malignaggi would never beat Broner.

    Most of you dumbies be must kids, with all this "past prime" crap. Broner never fights hard the first 4 rounds.
     
  12. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,690
    Mar 18, 2012
    Did you start watching boxing in 2010 :lol: :patsch :patsch :patsch
     
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    Juan Manuel Lopez is 29 :think
     
  14. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,690
    Mar 18, 2012
    Vargas was washed up by 25 years old.
     
  15. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    Paulie is an good measure of a fighter. only the very top guys can really put a beat him by a big margin.