Malignaggi: "They were not going to let Cotto win a decision...."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Blackness, May 8, 2012.


  1. antonio8904

    antonio8904 Atheist Full Member

    6,138
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    This...^

    I had it 9-3 Mayweather...
     
  2. bronx

    bronx Boxing Junkie banned

    12,190
    0
    Dec 26, 2007
    The point that I am trying to make is that Boxing is all ****ed up.

    Mayweather won the fight but not by no 10-2 rounds that's just plain bull****
     
  3. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    Get your mouth off Cotto's nuts and watch the fight again.
     
  4. Arranmcl

    Arranmcl Arran Full Member

    3,219
    2
    Jan 2, 2011
  5. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,005
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    From my understanding yes.
     
  6. Ziggy Montana

    Ziggy Montana The Butcher Full Member

    3,605
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    10-2 works with me. I had it 9-3. Those flurries Cotto threw while Mayweather had his back against the cables did almost nothing.
     
  7. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,005
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    Truth of the matter is this...If you didn't give Cotto at least 3 to 4 rounds, then you're a biased Floyd fan/Cotto hater...if you gave more...then you're a Floyd hater/Cotto fan/Pac fan.

    3 to 4 rounds for Cotto seems to be the median here.
     
  8. Ziggy Montana

    Ziggy Montana The Butcher Full Member

    3,605
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Slipery slope arguments don't work with me. Cotto clearly won rounds 6 and 8 and a case can be made for round 9, end of story. It has nothing to do with hating or being biased.
     
  9. Arranmcl

    Arranmcl Arran Full Member

    3,219
    2
    Jan 2, 2011
    I disagree, I like both fighters a lot and would have loved to see Cotto win. But Cotto won 6 and 8. Arguably 9. That's it IMO