Malligangi "they threatened to stop the fight when i asked for vada"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hard Hitta, May 13, 2013.


  1. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Don't dude... Just don't!!!

    There's been over a dozen or so threads on your very questions.

    Then it turned into a virgin science fest...

    In my limited understanding, I came to the conclusion that VADA is by far the 'better' testing organisation, in terms of it's methods (both testing and random sampling), management (Dr. Margaret Goodman) and a few other reasons.

    I personally don't have the 'proof', but this is just the conclusion I came to from reading some of the endless debates!
     
  2. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    No, unfortunately they cant.


    They are paid to be accurate.
     
  3. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    They are different, that is all.

    USADA caught Armstrong for example. That went above and beyond just blood and urine.
     
  4. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    Wait? Boxing is a corrupt sport?
     
  5. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    Any and every money making organisation is corrupt in some respect in my eyes.


    People are greedy, for everything unfortunately.
     
  6. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Yeah, but after how long?

    He'd been doping for YEARS.

    That's why they wanted to call him in, and ask HOW he managed to beat all the tests.

    There was also a Federal Enquiry in 2010. It then got dropped for some unknown reason.

    It was after that, in 2012 that USADA accused him of doping based on tests starting in 2009. It was also eye-witness accounts that got him.

    Now surely it only takes a few weeks for positive test results to emerge, if that?

    Why would it take until 2012 to get Armstrong, from test results taken in 2009?
     
  7. TMTPrince

    TMTPrince Active Member Full Member

    914
    0
    May 10, 2013
    we already know GBP doesnt use VADA. VADA wont tell the promoter that sample A has failed.
     
  8. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    You missed the whole Moralesless thing I guess?

    We now know that the USADA PRIVATE CONTRACTS are just used to help make sure the fighters are clean by the time the fighters take the commission's test. How else do you fail two tests with NO CONSEQUENCES? Open your eyes.
     
  9. bronx

    bronx Boxing Junkie banned

    12,190
    0
    Dec 26, 2007
    built in excuses
     
  10. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    I keep telling people this ****. GBP can't pay USADA enough bc it doesn't outweigh what they would lose for the Olympics.
     
  11. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    They will if the proper documents are signed. USADA will suppress the results for a fee. This is pretty much proven now. Not even debatable.
     
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,278
    36,545
    Jun 23, 2005
    USADA is perfectly fine.
     
  13. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Throughout all of this testing **** using Vada, Usada it baffles me that these state commissions haven't started doing random test by themselves. Even if its just 3 random urine test its a start.
     
  14. antonio plaisir

    antonio plaisir the detonator Full Member

    7,061
    3
    Nov 30, 2012
    not to mention their inaction over armstrong's positive results during his career.
     
  15. TMTPrince

    TMTPrince Active Member Full Member

    914
    0
    May 10, 2013
    of course it is it is good enough for our Olympic athletes that pay way more than GBP