Mancini vs Bradley

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by robert ungurean, Jul 12, 2018.


  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,238
    15,281
    Jun 9, 2007
    Lightweight 15 rds 8 oz gloves referee Carlos Padilla.
     
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Tim Bradley?

    He never fought at 135. I'd make him a heavy favorite over Mancini if they fought at 140 though. UD15
     
    Longhhorn71 likes this.
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,238
    15,281
    Jun 9, 2007
    My mistake...brain freeze for some reason I thought Bradley was at 135....delete thread!
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,331
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    Bradley would win at 140 because he's naturally bigger, but probably not as easily as some think.

    Tim Bradley is overrated on this forum. For some reason, he's often elevated on this forum to a level he was never at.

    Mancini would give a tough fight, especially considering Bradley often traded too much for his own good.

    But I do think he beats Mancini, probably by an 8-4-ish type decision.

    If they were the same natural size, I'd take Ray.