Manny and the " Tell Tell Signs " ?

Capitan, here is your ship...

This content is protected

 

You might call it sarcasm, but I think its just LukeO coming around .......he's knowingly being sarcastic, but subconsiously he's cleansing his soul with the truth!:yep

 

The dude is on ****ing PEDs.

 

idiots seem to forget that pac went from 106 to 147 OVER 10 ****ING YEARS!!!

CORRECTION: OVER 14 ****ING YEARS!!!

 

Dude you can't reason with these morons, I have tried. If they want to believe what a crackhead/woman beater tells them, let them believe it just shows their ignorance

 

Soak that in brother, but also soak in that in a span of 1year and 2 months, Pacquiao fought as a 130, 135, 140, and 147 pounder!

.......that one year span is when the suspiciouns arose.

Pare, education is a wonderful thing!:good

 

Another great thread!

The "Manny Pacquiao is doing so good he must be on PEDs theory" without any documantable evidence.

Only makes Manny Pacquiao's legend grow even more.

Pachaters adding to Pac's legendary staus, and they have no idea they are doing it! ​

 

He has never weighed 147 in any of his fights. he only weighegd 144 for the Cotto fight and 145.75 for the Clottey fight. And it's not 1 year 2 monhs, it's more like 2 years time.

 

2006 vs Morales-Pacquiao ring weight= 144

2009 vs Cotto-Pacquiao ring weight=149


Owned.

 

yessuh, yessuh, you an edya-ma-cated man divac. i be lookin on da intah-net and i be findin' this thing here with 'em purrty squiggly lines. can mah massah divac be explainin' ta poor dumb pare da meanin' of dem lines?

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/Th...ossible?_why_steroid_accusations_are_baseless

and i know pare be dumb and all, but can da good ol' massah divac be performin' some regression analysis and some analysis of da variance about the sample statistics (ah be satisfied wid 90% an'95% confidence) ta confirm for poor ol' pare dat da data be robust? thanks to da good massah divac.:hi:

 

I'll be damned if I'm going to go over weight issues with *******s again......let me lead you *******s to a couple of educational threads where I've already discussed and answered the issues of weight which you have brought up.......

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=213609



http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=213665

 

Between March of 2008 and May 2009, Pacquiao fought 4 fights......Starting with JMM at 130 lbs....
.....he then fought David Diaz at 135 lbs
....DLH at 147 lbs......
......and he capped it off in May 2009 against Ricky Hatton at 140 lbs.....

In a span of 1 year and two months, Manny Pacquiao fought in 4, count them.....4 ****ing weight divisions!:deal

 

yeah because you know you got owned, hence you don't wish to discuss it. Man up and say what you wanna say instead of pointing me to some threads. Let's not forget the original arguement which was you saying Pac is suspicious because he fought in all thoseweight classes in one year. Again, look at ring weight and tell me by how much it has changed. The only thing different he's doing now is not having to dehydrate himself before a weigh in. He can eat and still make weight. Get it?

I directly answered your bs and you had no answer to it. Again, man up and tell me how gaining 5lbs in 3 years is such a big deal?

 

Idiot my comments have nothing to do with that. I could care less about the numbers. I am talking about the BMI.

My comments are about the natural build for his demographic (Filipino) and his uncanny ability to put on 100% lean muscle mass without an ounce of fat. That crap doesn't happen.