Manny did offer Floyd 45/55 to the winner.

you forgot to put REBUTTAL AND OWNED in this post.

 

It took Manny 2 years to agree to a simple test. Your running off in an entirely different direction blur. This is not even relevant to the debate.atsch
The drug tests should have been agreed to in the first place WHICH THEY WERE....It wasn't until after Team Pac found out they couldn't have a "cutoff date" (which is stupid because the test would lose its integrity) did they say they wouldn't agree.

This is getting off topic though-We can do this all day-its just SPECULATION-Meantime I'm using the revenue and PPV numbers...they do not lie:deal

 

LOL

 

atsch

typical pa3tard response-Look at ya-Ya im so mad o my goodness-you gonna beat me up too:|:|

I could care less about this-But when it comes to the argument, and THE REASON WE ACTUALLY ON THIS WEBSITE-YOUR ARGUMENT WAS WEAK AND PATHETIC.:deal

 

you just got OWNED by Anthony dude

 

**** gossip post by a **** poster.

this is all hersey anyways and all based on what Manny (a guy who hardly speaks english and has next to no knowledge of negotiations and his finances) claims was said during a brief phone call. Manny doesn't promote himself so it's all irrelvant anyways, fact is the only person from Pacs camp that can make the fight refused to sit down and negotiate or even pick up his phone and Manny refused to make his promoter make the fight which he can do at anytime as he's Arum's boss not vice versa even though Arum clearly wears the pants in that relationship.


But anyways this whole post is BS!!! Even if Pac were able to negotiate a fight (which he isn't, he is under contract to Arum for this) this has not been confirmed whatsoever, the only people confirming it are team Pac who will do anything to save face in the media at this point after the horrible beating their rep has taken over the last few months. Pac could claim anything here, he could say Floyd asked for 8 billion and a fight in his backyard, there's no way to prove anything unless the call was recorded or PBF confirms it himself......

 

LMFAO-Look at the pa3tards...They couldn't fuk with the debate so they resorted to insulting the poster...

Look how they run from the debate and focus on the poster when their argument is shown to be weak.

Again-pa3tards use their "personal opinion" to make up their argument-I leave the bias out and go off the numbers that won't be ignored in negotiation.

Keep trying pa3tards and have fun talkin $hit. Like Charlie Sheen "I'm winning".

 

You cannot include Oscar in the equation, coz when Floyd fought Oscar, Oscar were considered the biggest cash cow in boxing then and he was riding on a Mayorga KO.. Then after that lost with Floyd, Oscar was still rebuilding his career by winning on Forbes and was planning of fighting Hatton then but was replaced by Manny when Ricky declined.. Oscar was actually gearing towards a rematch with Floyd and Manny was actually a substitute tune up fight.. Two different boxing events with two different scenarios, Oscar-Floyd was then considered the Mega-fight while Oscar-Manny was then labeled the Mega-Tune-Up-fight, when most of the pinoys didn't really bother to pay to watch the fight and to top that, it happened during the worst time of the recession...

 

if 55/45 is ****, then why did floyd rejected a 50/50 split then?

can some *****s answer this?

 

Ok so? The numbers are still there-For both fighters too-The Oscar fight CLEARLY shows the change in each fighter.

Again, Oscar is the common factor-I know the story behind De La Hoya-Floyd. i know the entire story-been following the sport since the late 80's and been following it as hardcore fan since the early 90's...before Floyd and Pac were even pro.

The Oscar fight CAN be used as it's the fight where both fighters $$ went up.

 

atsch

wow..I feel sorry for you-Your argument has been played and now you just starting overatsch

This what I'm talking about pa3tards...go back and look at this thread-look how many times this guy resorts to "focusing on the poster" rather than the argument at hand. You ignore valid info..the info you post is always bias and you know your opinion on the negotiations is based on your hatred of Floyd rather than the ACTUAL NUMBERS.:deal