Manny has picked his next opponent.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrjotatp4p, Dec 18, 2010.


  1. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers Kimbo #1 P4P Full Member

    7,057
    5
    Sep 16, 2010

    Who is more dangerous? A fighter with a puncher's chance or a fighter with no chance?
     
  2. He landed TWO.

    :deal
     
  3. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    in this case neither, shane or marquez would both get their asses beat from pillar to post equally. it doesn't matter how hard you can hit, which has been proven SEVERAL times in boxing.
     
  4. dvb

    dvb Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,826
    1
    Mar 16, 2010
    marquez bitched out with the classic money demand duck.

    and he if he thinks hes good enough and better than pac,he shoudltnt have beef with weight,or atlest wrangle where he can come in at 144 and pac can come in at 144 to 147.
    with marquez 144 fight night and pac 147 night of fight.

    but ide rather pac murders berto and teaches him a lesson or 2,than him retire mosely and face him after shanes bad form and looking bad.

    mosley is highest risk of losing by KO and least reward for fighting him at the moment.

    berto looks good vs nobodies,but has raw talent with speed and power.

    ide rather see berto vs mosley.

    or mosley vs williams,and berto vs cotto and if berto and mosely win those they could then face pacman.

    meanwhile pac fights marquez at 144 catchweight(which favours marquez,and makes the fight more worthwhile)

    but manny got 3 fights left really.

    berto,mosley mayweather.

    hes only fighting these othes fights cuz floyd avialable and not up for fighting him.

    Just enjoy pac putting on a show,giving us all 3 last great fights.
     
  5. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    oh right of course forgive me, i was off by one. he only landed two clean punches the entire fight, thanks for further proving my point.
     
  6. Miles5149

    Miles5149 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,822
    0
    Dec 30, 2007
    :lol:
     
  7. Riquelminho

    Riquelminho Member Full Member

    174
    0
    Oct 23, 2010
    Bob Arum is a Grade A ****.
     
  8. Mosley almost KO'd the best defensive fighter in the sport TWICE. If you don't see the significance of this, then **** off. And with Pacquiao's eagerness to take punishment to dish punishment, it makes for a more compelling fight than Marquez or Berto.

    Marquez has NO CHANCE.

    Berto has a slim chance, but still less than Mosley.

    :patsch
     
  9. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Key board warrior. Have you joined a gym yet? Don't answer bc I already know the answer. Kidding with you. Listen, Freddie Roach said Mosley was shot after Floyd beat him and he said he look bad in his fight with Mora. Now why would they pick a shot fighter? They would pick Mosley bc Mosley is no threat for Manny. Hell Mosley doesn't even have a jab to even make Manny honest. Berto is the best fight that can be made other than Mayweather.
     
  10. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Sounds like cherry picking to me. Argue to me that it's not. It's ok, Floyd does it too, but I don't want to hear any hypocritical bull****
     
  11. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    out of the 3, who do you think have a better chance at beating Pac?
     
  12. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    seriously man i know "common sense" is somewhat of an odd and other wordly concept amongst you *******s, but if you can grasp this concept for just this once then maybe you can see how ridiculous this fight is and how even more ridiculous you sound. just because mosley landed a mere TWO punches in a fight where he was terribly outclassed doesn't increase his chances or make him more dnagerous in any way shape or form.

    for one thing you're not gonna fight shane mosley no matter how old he is or much of a defensive wizard you are and NOT get hit, thats just shane mosley. he maybe nowhere near his prime but power is something that never leaves you. i honestly dont understand (even for a *******) how you can defend such a disaster of a matchup where the only inevitable outcome is a ridiculously one-sided beating in favor of pac. berto is young, fresh, undefeated, and most importantly holds a linear strap. mosley is old, slower, coming off two horrible performances, and also most important: BELTLESS. you can nitpick the two punches shane landed on floyd all you want until the cows come home, it still doesn't make him a good opponent nor does it increase his chances AT ALL.
     
  13. Roach was ****-talking. He also said Floyd's legs are gone. So if Pac beats Floyd, will people be saying that Pac won because Floyd was old and on the decline?

    Mosley is an an action-packed where Pac stands to be knocked out. It's a more dangerous fight than Marquez or Berto. And it also happens to be that Mosley is the biggest draw of the three.

    I don't see how that can be seen as cherrypicking. Cherrypicking is fighting an opponent with NO CHANCE, i.e. Marquez @ welterweight, not fighting Cotto/Margarito/Clottey (biggest names in the welterweight division).
     
  14. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    honestly, BERTO. sure he may not have the experience and name recognition of shane mosley. but he's in his prime, undefeated, and holds a linear belt. it would look ALOT better on paper to beat a young not only taking away his zero, but further unifying the division you're considered the best at.
     
  15. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    thats shane mosley in a nut shell pal, sorry.