Manny has picked his next opponent.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrjotatp4p, Dec 18, 2010.


  1. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    don´t justify it man,mosley does not deserve the fight and evryone knows it. pac will tko him.
     
  2. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    how much did the combined "drawing power" of Marquez and Berto made?
     
  3. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    **** arum and mosley
     
  4. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    Pac will be the favorite on all 3, but Mosley got the better chance out of the 3.
     
  5. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    :patsch

    seriously man just log off, you sound just as ******ed claiming im a fan of a fighter i dont even like all the while repeating the same mindless dribble benjamin tried to pass off as something worthy of consideration. just enjoy pac beating up broken down old men and be happy, why cant you be happy?
     
  6. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    log off if you cant see who among the 3 got a better chance at beating Pac.
     
  7. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    sorry, here on planet earth we take the guy who has a strap, in his prime, and undefeated. not a man who's old, strapless, and coming off two horrible performances. OOHHH BUT WAIT!! BUT WAIT!! HE LANDED TWO PUNCHES ON FLOYD! HE'S THE MAN!!! just run back to pacland and enjoy the myth that is manny pacquiao
     
  8. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    why is floyd not being considered? for how long will he be tied up with legal issues?
     
  9. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    so belts are great now eh?:lol:
     
  10. Dumbest statement ever posted on this forum. While you're using INACTIVE and long-retired boxers, why not go with a big name Hollywood actor? Pacquiao-Pitt! Pacquiao-Cruise!

    :patsch

    Pac has at minimum THREE All-Time Greats on resume, and he's blasted out big names in the sport. Pacquiao has done great things, Berto hasn't done ****. With 2-3 fights left in his career, why waste it on a no-name and risk losing millions? You can argue that Clottey is unknown, but his resume is still 10X what Berto's is.

    There are no freebies in life, stupid mother****er.

    :deal
     
  11. Triggerhappy

    Triggerhappy New Member Full Member

    92
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    Didn't Roach/Pac said he'll still be fighting for 3 more years? At least that's what was reported.
    So if that's the case, he can fight all these 3 and all the names you want just fill in the blanks. I prefer he fights Marquez now although if he's gonna fight both anyway, it's better to fight shane now rather than later since he's older than jmm. If it's shane now, absolutely jmm next, that is if pbf still is "indisposed".
     
  12. Excellent logic there, Corky.

    Pac beating Morales, Barrera, Marquez, Hatton, ODLH, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, winning Fighter of the Year 3X, 4 lineals, and Fighter of the Decade = sham

    Berto having never fought a single elite opponent = the real deal?

    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    The doctor should have choked your ass out with the umbilical chord.

    :hi::hi::hi:
     
  13. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    :lol:
     
  14. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    :rofl:rofl

    You are one mean mofo..
     
  15. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    who in the name of all thats holy said berto is the "real deal"?? seriously what a shitty cop-out to an argument you've been losing the minute yu posted. you still haven't asked any of my questions, what has shane mosley done besides "name recognition? to deserve a fight with the best fighter in the sport?? so you're saying its okay for pac to handpick broken down opponents coming off losses with nothing but name recognition left in their legacy to go out on?? its okay for pac to fight old former champions at the worst moments in their careers? thats the only thing you're banking on and quite frankly it STILL hasn't worked.