I'm telling you that Hamed didn't fight at 135lbs. He's 5ft 2? I think it's better to keep these guys in the weight class they shared. If you think Pac could take FLUSH bombs from Hamed at featherweight and live to tell the tale - best of luck to you! Pacs punch resistance will have improved as he climbed the weights so your argument is flawed.
edit: I ****ed up here. Don't even know why we're even discussing this fight with the weight difference.
nah, just calling on some of the BS excuses that bitter mexicans like you would always say whenever a mexican boxer lose. :hi:
I took out everything. Didn't realize that Hamed fought at 125, for some reason I thought he was at 135. Although, I do think that a prime De La Hoya punched harder than Hamed.
I agree with this. Definitely a tough one to call at the weight, but id favour Paquaio 7 times out of 10.
No, not at all. I used to be a fan of Hamed and saw most of his fights, just didn't realize that he fought at a lower class than I originally though. Not a huge mistake here.
Normally I wouldn't think its a big deal, but I did base my whole argument on thinking that Hamed was bigger, so yeah I did **** up.
hamed would have a good chance at 122 where pac is much less polished and will fight you head-on than lets say the pac that fought MAB and JMM at 126. stylewise hamed could be more difficult for pac than MAB, but i would take pac's straighter punches than hamed, not to mention the difference in class.