Manny Pacquiao (2009) Vs. Errol Spence (2016) @ 147: Who Wins and How?

Catch-weight aka drained or not drained? If not drained, then Spence by a brutal KO

 

You are a very easy person to dislike.

 

Pac stops him the same as he did to Cotto.

Would have loved to have seem the Pac from DLH/Hatton/Cotto fights vs Mayweather. That Pacman was truly amazing.

 

Wasn't that Pac struggling with Marquez? What makes you think he would do any better than he did against Mayweather?

 

How is the Pac from DLH/Hatton/Cotto fights the one from the Marquez fight? How does that even make sense?

 

How was he any different?

 

I'm not sure this is going. For me those 3 fights were peak Pacman. I'm sure you will agree that fighters are at different levels are different stages of their careers.

 

Only difference I saw was the level of opponent. It was easy to look good against a shot De la Hoya. Cotto was a good win I do admit but I wasn't surprised he won. I didn't think Cotto was quick enough to keep Pac in front of him.

 

Well considering Pac never fought anyone without a catch clause during that period I'm justified to ask if it's catchweight or not you moron.

 

I seriously hope Spence loses tomorrow night.

The hype for a guy who hasn't beat a top 10 isn't right.

 

Brook has only beaten ONE Top 10 in his career since 2004.

 

And Spence has never fought one....

Point?