Manny Pacquiao fighting for a title in his EIGHTH DIVISION! *What's the CATCH??*

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jul 27, 2010.


  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,648
    18,374
    Oct 7, 2006
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm sure you bitched when DLH fought Mayorga for he vacant WBC belt... And now here's where you DLH luvin ass complaind about the weight...you know, like when DLH fought Hops at 158?
     
  3. El Intocable

    El Intocable Guest

    Or when Chavez fought for Whitaker's welterweight belt at a catchweight.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yeah. Uliuli's just a butt hurt DLH fanboy....
     
  5. thatguy

    thatguy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,935
    23
    Nov 15, 2009
    seems thats all he is, he is givin these titles on a silver platter. whatever happened to beating the champion. and wasnt foreman too tall? pac ducked foreman? haha
     
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,648
    18,374
    Oct 7, 2006
    1. DLH didn't jump into 154 for a avcant belt.
    2. DLH Jumped to 154 and fought the WBC champ.
    3. DLH didn't make the 154 champ come down in weight.
    4. Infact ion his PRIME, Oscar didn't make anyone come down in weight.
    5. It wasn't untill he was past it and boxing part time, and realized that 160 was too much after having fought Sturm at 160 for the WBO MW belt, that HOPKINS requested the fight to be made at 156.

    Pacquiao fights at catchweights far too often..That **** is abusive. You're dumbass can't see that they do it for a reason, and that's to weaken the oppoenent..It sure as hell isn't because they think it will make the oppoenent swifter, lighter on his feet and faster.:patsch Dumb ****!

    BTW, u stupid peice of ignorant ****, DLH fought Mayorga for MAYORGA"S WBC belt, not a vacant one..Your dumbass has to lie to make worthless points.:-(
     
  7. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    I don't see the problem here. Many fighters did that and if both agree then what's your problem?
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,648
    18,374
    Oct 7, 2006
    To tall??? More like to fresh...

    Seems like Pac likes fighting fighters on the decline.
     
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,648
    18,374
    Oct 7, 2006
    Once, it's okay, twice, c'mon, three times!!!!!!

    It's obviously an advantage for Pac, that's why they keep doing it.
     
  10. El Intocable

    El Intocable Guest

    He fights at catchweight too often?he only fought at a catchweight once.
     
  11. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,618
    17,157
    Mar 5, 2006
    you'll be buying the ppv anyways uliuli.

    Morales wasn't on the decline. Pac just whooped his ass plain simple
     
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Isn't it obvious that his opponent is already naturally bigger than him?, it was okay for you to see Margarito say he will only rematch Santos at 147 but will gladly move up to 154 for DLH?. Weren't you here supporting that as shameless as you are?

    About the advantage, if it's an advantage then why doesn't Margarito say he doesn't want any of it?. Cotto was open about it, he said anything below 145 then it's an advantage for Pac, yet you insist that Cotto was somehow handicapped going into that fight. :lol: Even though Cotto recently once again opened up about the subject because fools like you pretend to be his body and a part of his team and made it clear the weight was no issue.

    By the way, this isn't the third time, it's the second. The DLH fight was agreed to be at 147 and Pac moved up two weight divisions for it. Yes, that was also the fight you predicted a KO win for DLH inside three rounds at most.
     
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,648
    18,374
    Oct 7, 2006
    Yeah, I need to support Margarito..I guess..

    You believing Morales wasn't on the decline tells me all I need to know about your boxing knowledge....its ****. ;)
     
  14. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Then why was he the underdog against almost all of them?, explain that fool. You say they're on the decline so it doesn't hurt your ass more than it already does. I'm a Morales fan too and admit he was on the decline for the third fight, but the first two he sure as hell wasn't. The loss to Raheem was because of him moving up and looking completely out of shape, if he was washed up he would have been knocked out right there and then. Diaz nearly knocked him out when he was really washed up and completely out of it.

    Don't try to completely discredit Pacquiao's record, if you don't approve of it then the whole world does and being P4P#1 isn't given as a donation. It's based on accomplishments and performance. Above all, he also already got the fighter of the generation. You want to tell us they gave it for him because he beat up washed up past it fighters?, get the hell out of here with that nonsense.