Manny Pacquiao: He needs Mayweather and he knows it???

Whatever man.

 

wow, well done....you win!



atsch

 

Whoa....Calm down there brah. I'm definitly not an idiot. But if you think so and stick to that stance I'll be that!:good Coming from a ****** I'm like Einstein compared to you. Manny could retire now and he'd still be considered the best fighter of this era and of course the best fighter of the last 10 yrs. I said that a win over Floyd would be a great accomplishment and would take his legacy to a new level....but that's like telling Bill Gates that he needs anther MICROSOFT in order to be viewed as one of the most successful and richest men in the world.

Roy Jones has a better resume than PAC? Really? And I'm the idiot? JCC has a great resume too, but his best wins have been Whitatker and Taylor. Definitley BOTH have tremendous resumes but PAC is definitly ahead. Don't even try to say Floyd's resume is comparable to Mannys....it's not a good look brah.

 

Excellent post!:deal

 

Who talked about winning anything?

Im not going to argue something to exhaustion just to try and prove something to some guy on an internet forum.

 

fighter of the year 3X...he's bound to take over, even if floyd retired or not..

and oh

Pac is best fighter of the decade....And its not by default....deal:deal

 

No you're just a ******* who can't seem to deal in reality. You pick and choose who you give passes to based on who you like. It's perfectly fine with you for Pac to finish his career without an elite African American on it when there's some fighting in the division he's campaigning in. Especially considering African Americans have pretty much dominated this sport but he chose to avoid them throughout his career. How in the **** can his resume be complete? If he never faced some of the best in boxing. I'm not letting you Pac fans or Pac off the hook that easy.:hi: If PBF chose not to fight elite Mexican fighters only other Latinos you and others would be up in arms. Show some consistency here.:deal

 

did cotto beat mosley? then cotto is the best opponent than mosley..so its not ducking dude... its fighting the best.

 

when the front page of the website on which you are posting on disproves your argument, you basically fail

 

shane is the #1 WW

 

You mean a guy who was brutally beat up by a man with loaded gloves and who went life and death with Clottey? Are you trying to tell me that Cotto was a harder fight for Pac than Mosley would be? Log off man.:-(

 

Mosley was the hotter fighter and had a belt who he took from Margo. Cotto had a vacant title that was won against Jennings and was nothing more than a paper champion. Try that **** with someone who doesn't know boxing and don't know what the **** they're talking about because it won't work with me.:deal

 

according to who? cotto gave shane a big L in his record..

 

I love my favourite fighter so i bash the others. :|

 

still cotto beats shane.. you can say hes hot (or u can say hes sexy) but still he has been beaten by cotto. pac fought cotto in his prime. cotto's loss from marg was a beatdown - yes - but still cotto is in his prime. dont discredit pacs win dude. ps. u can discredit pacs win in the pac-morales3.. im not gonna argue with that