Manny Pacquiao is now Top 15 ATG!!!

just answer my question fazooka. is pac pass his prime now at age 30 and started at the same age as barrera at 16 with his fair shair of wars and a style that is not suited for longetivity?

 

Who said those guys were my fighters? You do realize I was at Wildcard with Manny for a couple of years he is good people, I mean I support Pacquiao no doubt, I just dont suck his balls like you guys do, I am a fan of the sport all together and I am calling **** how I see it.

You are pacquiao fans I bet if I search all your post right now its 99% Pacquiao meaning your not a fan of the sport your a fan of your home town hero big difference.

 

so what happened to your boxing career? did you tried also one of those illegal cups roach made just for you?

 

No not yet, you can not compair it here seriously when Manny fought Barrera, he had already had 60 ****ing professional fights and many of them wars against top elite fighters

 

Just opened up my own boxing club, and no Roach never made one for me, but he does get them made for all the bread winners, even Khan has one now.
it is an illegal cup I wouldnt expect you to know cus you dont know the sport much less the rules.

 

****ing double standards. have you seen pac's fights during his teen and when he was still green? most of them are wars and he would take on or a couple of shots just to get in that big one. if you say that barrera was pass his prime after a streak of wins that included barrera and morales and a lopsided loss to a pre-prime pac at age 29, how about pac who is now at 30 with almost the same amount of ring wars with as much fight against elite and HOF fighters?

 

Yes he gave me them on tape and no they were not the kind of wars that Barrera had with the likes of Mckenny or even a prime agapito sanchez That Barrera did beat, but Manny drew with.
Yes I know manny started young but I know the only fights he has been in trouble with were the ones he was stopped in and the Nidel Hussein fight in which should also be another TKO on his record that was the longest ten count I have seen

Pac at his age now will continue to do well as long as roach keeps demanding fighters dehydrate themselves to fight, or if Roach continues to have manny take fights against guys who are not what they used to be.

This is part of the game like it or not those guys were past their prime and there is nothing wrong with that, its called good match making and promoting and thats what they did they got manny in there with a couple guys who had big names big following and respect in the sport, the only time it becomes a problem is when fans make more out of it than what it really is.
Cotto will be a test mark my words and I dont think Manny passes this one neither.

 

Good point.:bbb

 

Exactly. To see a guy who was a great featherweight challeging the top dogs at welterweight is impressive. Let's not forget that Pacman is also the only one to win 4 lineal titles in the history of the sport. I think he might have surpassed Whitaker already, or he is very close.

 

Sorry to pop your bubble....well actually I'm not sorry at all...

Cotto will leave Pacquiao belly up in the 7th round.

I just hope he is not seriously or fatally injured !!!

 

If, and this is a big if, Pacquaio was to beat Cotto,mosely & PBF, he would be top 5 ATG without a doubt.......

 

And Manny isnt going to be one of them:good

 

I find it funny how people are so sure that Manny is gonna lose...Have you not learned anything from watching Pacman yet.

I suppose you predicted Manny would give de la hoya such a beatdown and that he would knock hatton spark out in 2 rounds.

 

So true. Those who are so sure manny would lose before the fight taking place would just look so stupid after a pac win, especially if it was so one-sided.

BTW, going back to the oscar fight, what if roach never said oscar couldn't pull the trigger anymore or he saw iv marks, would it make pac look much more impressive with his destruction of oscar? and going further why would roach even mention those (even though they could be false)? its possible it was meant to give pac confidence rather than discredit a win