Floyd said he was old enough to be Canelo's daddy, but Floyd didn't fight like a Daddy would. A Daddy wouldn't be scared of his son, but Floyd was so scared of Canelo that he kept flinching when Canelo would feint Floyd over and over again. You really are a Joker with the idea that Robert Guerrero and Victor Ortiz did better than Canelo lol. Victor Ortiz losing his cool and heatbutting Floyd then getting punked out cold is better than going the distance and getting a Majority Decision? Canelo came much closer to beating Floyd than Robert Guerrero. Remember the look on Floyd's face when the judges announced the draw card. Floyd was like what just happened? Floyd escaped by the hair of his chinny chin chin! Canelo took him into deep, deep waters. Floyd almost drowned that night. And Pacquiao? LOL Pacquiao lost to Floyd WIDE. That wasn't even close. It was amazing that a young pre-Prime, drained Canelo did much better vs Mayweather than Pacquiao did.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/dec/23/manny-pacquiao-floyd-mayweather-blood-testing that's one
No. That doesn't follow any kind of reality or logic. Pac said he would take drug testing as long as there is a cut off. So he never refused drug testing.
No. While I understand a lot of people do embrace the idea that things evolve in such a manner, I respectfully and strongly disagree. I do not personally adhere to that view point. I do not believe that Manny or Floyd would beat any fighter in history of their size. I wouldn't be quick to count them out against anyone, but I think if they hypothetically could fight every ATG of similar size throughout their respective weight-spans, they would both surely lose some fights along the way.
Thanks. And see! You just said it right there "no one can argue his incredible boxing skills". You qualified it, but I think you might rate Floyd a little higher than you suggest, just as I believe @Pimp C would probably rate Pacquiao higher than he might otherwise suggest. I know this isn't a first rodeo with you two. I respect each of your boxing opinions, sometimes agreeing with each of you, sometimes disagreeing with each of you. But regarding Pac-May, I firmly believe that the "truth" falls somewhere in between the extremist polar opposite view points you each embrace.
Well, everyone is entitled to his own opinion. And by no means am I claiming mine is any more valuable than yours or anyone's here. But to reiterate what I've already said, I'd be inclined to have both Pacquiao and Mayweather somewhere in the 10-25 range. But that's just my opinion.
