Manny Pacquiao...is the resume really as great as its made out to be???

lol.....I don't mind. It's funny to see what they actually post and its clear they have little to offer, but it keeps these boards "entertaining". Some folks just get tired of their garbage but I see it as a way to educate....although it's like I'm banging my head against a wall with some of them.

 

:happy

i felt bad being absent the time the poll opened. it shud be 50% for nallege.:rofl:rofl

 

lets buzz each other after nov 14. :good

 

yes pacman's resume is that good. You'd be hard pressed to find a better one.

 

Yes. And it's even better than when you first made this thread.

 

To answer the OP: it depends on the type of person talking about the resume.

I think most can determine a legitimate evaluation to one that's not. Whether that be pro or con.

But his resume is very, very good.

 

and he's not yet finish...

 

Pacquiao IS a line champion in 4 out of 7 divisions he won titles. 112 126 130 & 140.

Barerra (29) was in his prime, who has eight straight wins when Pacquiao(24), who wasn't even in his prime, beat the **** out of him. Some people fail to realized that when Pacquiao was not even in his prime when he was at the lower weight classes.

Pacquiao fought 10 boxers at 122 and starched them all(except for Sanchez, who is already dead, who should've been QD). He moved up in weight instead of facing Ayala. Which do you think is harder and better?

Diaz didn't become a belt holder because he's lucky. He was good not great boxer for Pacquiao to test his ability as boxer. You saw the result. Casamayor was fuc.king old. If you think Barerra was shot at 29 what makes you think that Casamayor is not shot? Tsk tsk. J. Diaz lost a close fight against Campbell (SD). Campbell is also old. IMO Campbell is not even that good.

Hoya was **** because he **** himself. IMO, Hoya and his team purposely made Hoya's body to look like **** because they want to match Pacquiao's speed, of course it's only an assumption. IMO, Pacquiao would've still won if he had fought a prime Hoya. YES, I typed PRIME Hoya! :bbb

In conclusion, YOU SIR IS A PAC-HATER.

 

Anyway, Pacquiao has titles in 7 ****ing different weight divisions. 4 of them were lineal titles. Pacquiao is the only boxer in history that has won 7 titles in different divisions and 4 of them were LINEAL TITLES. BTW, he is currently the only boxer has won 4 lineal titles. OH correct me if I'm wrong but no boxer from the 106 been successful after 122-126?

Being undefeated means very little. Seriously, that doesn't mean they're great. If he's so great fans should be satisfied with his achievements instead MANY not some are questioning it.

Roy Jones Jr. and Shane Mosley had some juice. :hey

BHop and Mosley are not ahead. Many regular fans and casual fans (I forgot the website someone posted made a thread about it a couple days ago) consider Pacquiao the second greatest boxer next to Sugar Robinson. You can tell the 500k+ people who voted that they're wrong if you want.

I can't believe you think Wlad has a better resume than Pacquiao. atsch

You're just a hater.

 

Yeep, and Pacquiao cemented his rank as the king by facing better quality opponents than Fraud when he was the "king".

 

For you to even bring up the fact that people voted pac 2nd best boxer ever does not help your argument one bit, because anyone with any sense knows a lot of nuthuggers who only heard of pac 2 years ago voted on that poll.

Actually you know what, you can keep that 2nd best boxer EVER statement, i mean 500 thousand people cant be wrong can they:think

So i guess if Mayweather beats the 2nd best boxer ever in the history of the sport then he surely makes the top 10 at least:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

:good Exactly

 

Pac has fought dela hoya, hatton and now cotto. atsch

Mayweather fought 2 out of the last 3 of pac's recent opponents. 2 of which he fought and won before pacatsch

 

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4656584

Bert is a *******

 

It goes a little beyond what has transpired in the last two years brah....it's PAC's consistancy facing top tier comp that solidifies his rank. Floyd has very good names and a good resume, but PAC's resume is on anther level.....Which is only b/c PAC pushes the needle where Floyd is satisfied looking for the money fights without the risk. I'm very happy to see Floyd step up!