Manny pacquiao is wrong because he is continuously "reaching for excuses"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sdsfinest22, Jan 4, 2010.


  1. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    nice post again...i see what your saying..ur reasoning is basically "manny and his team aren't on the same page and a lot of what his team has said probably was wrong information for the simple fact of lack of communiction"

    fair enough argument..

    I can't really say much other than pac team represent him and if they are giving false information such as "roach saying they agreed to the testing on dec 13th when that was a lie" than manny needa step up to the plate and let em know what he wants them to say...this way we dont have his trainer telling us he cant test within 30 days of a fight when he could do it all along...

    All these excuses are the reason for my suspicion..nothing floyd sr said means **** nor do i base anything off my argument as to what floyd sr said...
     
  2. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    excuses are not new to Pac

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOaszVHD6YQ&NR=1[/ame]
     
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    TRY ANSWERING WITH AN ANSWER THAT MAKES SENSE:patsch

    This content is protected
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    ****in pac fans cant come up with one damn "source" everything they got is based on "floyds rep"...****in pathetic ass posters who only on here to talk ****..going through most of their posts i can see they don't follow boxing very much and now i see the reason they will only take pacquiao's side
     
  5. kartog

    kartog Agent Smith Full Member

    3,975
    84
    Sep 8, 2006
    There's a vast difference between what you believe and what reality is. You mean to say, all this time that Floyd came up to welterweight, what, since 2005, and having fought five guys at '47, the best name he could come up with is Zab Judah?

    How dense or fanatical, maybe both, are you if you believe Floyd Jr has not ducked at all the top welterweights since coming up to the weight class in 2005?

    Pacquiao has only had two fights at welterweight, and already surpassed Floyd's quality, or lack thereof, of opposition. That right there says it all.
     
  6. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
  7. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    Its odd they agreed on the split and then afterwards they are arguing about the test. Arum even thrown into the mix of the conflict of interest Oscar has because he promotes both fighters (Because Arum convinced Pac to breach the contract). The pleedings of the case have shown to have factual inconsistencies showing that his lawyer was given incorrect information and or he failed to verify the information. The pleedings further allege a conspiracy to defame Pac--I doubt they could ever prove it. Lastly, Pac's conditioning team allegedly has a history with steroids (Balco).
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    ANOTHER HOLE IN PAC FANS ARGUMENTS....THEY JUST CANT SEEM TO COME UP WITH A SOLID ARGUMENT BACKED BY GOOD FACTS..A SHAME THEY THINK THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT..I MEAN IF THIS WERE A COURT OF LAW THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE LAUGHED PAC AND HIS CONTINUOUS EXCUSES RIGHT OUT THE COURTROOM:rofl
     
  9. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    GOOD INFO:good

    PAC FANS WHY DO YOU IGNORE INFORMATION LIKE THIS WHEN LOOKING AT YOUR ARGUMENT?

    ONE: U JUST DONT KNOW ABOUT IT

    TWO" U JUST DONT LIKE FLOYD AND THERFOR NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES UR GONNA OPPOSE HIM (THIS SEEMS LIKE THE MOST LIKLEY AS EVERY PAC FAN IS BASING THEIR ARGUMENT ON FLOYDS' "REPUTATION"..

    OR

    3: YOUR JUST A DIE HARD PAC FAN AND YOUR NOT GONNA LEAVE UR BOY'S SIDE...EVEN IF HE WAS THE ONE ASKING FOR THE TESTS U STILL WOULD STICK BY HIM..FAIR ENOUGH

    BUT IF IT WERE MANNY REQUESTING THE TESTS AND FLOYD SAYING NO TO THEM THAN I WOULD SIDE WITH MANNY CUZ I BELIEVE HIS ARGUMENT MORE..NOT BECAUSE I DISLIKE FLOYD SO HE IS ALWAYS WRONG NO MATTER WHAT...

    SO ANY MORE SOURCES? I'VE CONTINUOUSLY ASKED THROUGH MANY TRHEADS AND NOT 1 POSTER HAS PROVIDED A CONCRETE VIDEO OR ANYTHING WHERE FLOYD SAYS HE DOESN'T WANT THE MANNY FIGHT...HMMM.....

    PAC FANS BEING OWNED ALOT LATLEY
     
  10. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    See man...everytime i put up some sources exposing pac and his arguments the ****in pac fans are quick to leave or not focus on those particular posts...im tired of proving them wrong..not even talking **** but when you make 5 threads about things and in every good post backed with evidence and you get nothing in return as far as concrete evidence it's clear that pac fans argument is a bunch of bull**** and they only take their view cuz its "pacquiao" or "they hate floyd" damn shame...

    Idiots want sources so i provide em..then they downplay them or run out the thread..this even after i begged them not to leave when i started posting videos and ****..those ****er$ still left
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Where is all the proof that Pac is a druggie? I still have not seen any yet. Where is it?
     
  12. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    NEVER SAID HE WAS A DRUGGIE U IDIOT..READ THE THREAD BEFORE U ANSWER...UR OFF TOPIC...:deal
     
  13. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Farmboxer in this thread for the 3435445 time...the idea here has nothing to do with floyd so get off his dick and balls...look at the different stories pac has come up with and explain why that is not suspicious...at first he was scared of needles...than he wouldnt give blood within 30 days...well that was proven wrong..than floyd says ok no usada but than arum says no usada and we will only go by the nsac...

    So now explain all that?? Over the course of a few weeks pac's argument has gone from "i am scared of needles" to "i dont test within 30 days' to "let the nsac handle it"....n not 1 poster on here has any evidence...btw my sources ill post again for you so i can own ur ***** ass for the 35354 time in the last year
     
  14. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    HERE U GO IDIOT FARMBOXER:hi: WHY WAS PAC'S ARGUMENT GOING BEYOND WHAT HE ORIGINALLY SAID?? HMMM..REACHING FOR EXCUSES PAC??:think

    FIRST AS WE ALL KNOW MANNY AGREES TO THE TESTING...CHECK OUT YOU TUBE FOR THE VIDEO ON DEC 13TH WHERE ROACH OPENLY ADMITS TO AGREEING TO THE TESTING-COULDN'T FIND IT BUT IT IS THERE

    THAN THEY FIND OUT THE PROCEDURES THAT USADA GIVES AND THEY SAY NO THANKS WE DONT WANT IT CUZ PAC HAS TROUBLE GIVING BLOOD WITHIN 30 DAYS.."IT WEAKENS HIM"

    THAN WE COME ALONG TO THIS...HIS FIRST EXCUSE IS HE IS SCARED OF NEEDLES...THE ****ING TATTOOS PROVED THAT THEORY WRONG ALONG WITH THIS VIDEO...


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq4qLX0h9Zk"]
    This content is protected
    [/ame]


    SO THAN WE HAVE A NEW EXCUSE-AFTER FLOYD SAYS OK NO USADA BUT WE WANT A RANDOM TEST PAC AND HIS TEAM COME BACK WITH....."WELL WE WILL LET THE NSAC DECIDE NOW. WE AGREED TO THESE 3 BLOOD TESTS BUT NOW WE DON'T WANT TO LEAVE IT ALL UP TO THE NSAC"

    SO WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN THE CHANGE...FLOYD AND HIS TEAM ARE ON RECORD AS SAYING THEY WILL BACK OUT OF "USING THE USADA"..

    HMMMMM ..U BEEN OWNED:deal:hi:
     
  15. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    The problem is they just don't like the facts. It is like when you argue with a woman they change the argument when they realize you are proving them wrong.