Manny Pacquiao (of today) vs Felix Trinidad (of 2004) who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beezy, Sep 7, 2010.


  1. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    *******s will attack me, but I'd go with Trinidad.. even if he already lost to Hopkins and had problems with De La Hoya and Mayorga...
     
  2. ant

    ant Ride The Walrus Full Member

    2,782
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    at 5'11 and his style most definitely has a greta chance of winning....but we will never know lol
     
  3. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,352
    4
    May 11, 2009
  4. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    The way you answered, I could tell you're a *******... lol
     
  5. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010

    I am a Pacfan but unlike Hopkins, Manny is not the best at taking away a fighters best weapon. I think tito's left hook and size would make for a tough fight for Manny. He would def be on the canvas. that would be some fight man.
     
  6. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    Bro, it definitley would. I'd pay ppv.
     
  7. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    If Pac chooses to box I think his fast feet and lateral movement will just confuse Tito altogether. I know DLH was much taller to outbox Tito but Pac makes up for it with his footspeed. Also it depends how well Pac takes the shot, a flush clean left hook from Tito and I think Pac gets dropped.

    Hard to choose but id definitely bet on Pac on this one.
     
  8. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    Honestly I would pay PPV 100%. I think that would be a fight of the decade contender for sure. Style wise they are perfect for each other. Big action fight.
     
  9. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
  10. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    I think Pacs footspeed and in and out movement is unlike anything Tito ever fAced in his career. Pac would not be easy to land on, and Tito is actually kind sluggish and plodding , I don't think he would be able to land a real clean left hook. Size wise , Tito is much bigger , and has great power at WW... But I would still fAvor Pac
     
  11. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    I gotta go with Pac on this one. Tito's biggest problem was dealing with foot movement. Tito always had to reset his feet before he could throw any effective punches and he had the habit of following his opponents around. Pac's blistering foot movement would have Tito constantly turning and resetting... and I don't think that Tito would really get much of a chance to get many effective punches off.
     
  12. Atritionist

    Atritionist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,473
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    Trinidad would take it.
     
  13. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    I would only agree with this because I said the Tito of
    This content is protected
    . If I said the Tito of 2000 or 2001, then I'd disagree... at WW we wasn't really sluggish.. against Mayorga n Hopkins I think somewhat he could have been... and especially against Winky.
     
  14. Dirty Bastard

    Dirty Bastard Dirty As Hell Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Jan 19, 2008
    Trinidad of 2004 was a ****ing middleweight........!!!!
     
  15. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    Yeah you're right, I forgot and thought he was a junior middleweight...just think if he dropped to 154