Manny Pacquiao: The BEST 140 pounder this decade

:rofl:rofl

:yep

 

:?

:huh What the ****???:think

 

you are an absolute ****

 

This thread is proof that *******eness is out of control!

The fact that a few of his fellow *******s agree is a testament to the *******edess and nut huggerness that blinds these tards into believeing that Pac would beat Duran or Sal Sanchez, or even a Prime DLH and Tito Trinidad.

 

Ignorance at it's finest.

 

:?

My goodness!atsch

Seriously, do you have a clue to what you're trying to say?:-( Apperantly not....Again, what the **** are you talking about???:?

 

you seem to be a decent poster but this one is just plain stupid....


you cant be the best for the decade in one fight let alone all time for christ sake...you got to be consistent year after year...fighting different styles in one weight and winning them if not most of them would you be considered best for a certain period....

 

He either started this thread when he was completely bladdered or he's just in love with pac. I believe the latter.

 

OMFG!:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

HE ISN'T!!!!

He's done a lot, but the most dominant HW thus far has been Wlad.

It pains me to say it.

It doesn't mean Lewis wasn't amongst the best of all time. He was fairly dominant right through the 90's (he might have a claim there, though I'd say Holyfield) and his very good wins in the early 2000's add to that.

But Wlad has had a lot of fights, lost some, won most, had a lot of title defences, and going into the end of the decade has probably been the most dominant.

If Lewis were still around. He would be. But he isn't.

Tszyu might not have been the complete dominating force over Light-Welter in the 90's (good wins but others did well at the weight) or the 2000's (though there is a claim for him) but you are saying the decade as per YOUR CHOOSING.

A decade is from the '00 to the '00. Not from '93-'95. That is being the best for ten years, but not for THE decade. Which is the 10's, the 20's, the 30's etc etc.

Unless someone has done a huge amount in say, 00-03, I would say the guy that is consistent for double that AND beat the guy that was dominating for that short period before him, is the best, especially if he beats Pac at 140, who by your definition could be one of the best with a single win over Hattonatsch

I hate to rant, but you are a moron, and it's not just me who thinks it I'm afraid.

Go to the BBC 606 Forum, you'll be a God there:good

 

No one would put Roy Jones in the HW top ten.

Ruiz would rate higher.

As I say, WAS RAY LEONARD THE BEST MW OF THE ****IN' 80'S??????


NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!