Manny Pacquiao versus Salvador Sanchez.....

What do you mean "boost them up" What does that mean?

 

I guess I like them exactly as much as I like Floyd creampies :huh so, not at all...

 

You say morales and the barerra losses were good losses, what do you mean by that?

You totally disregard the zaragosa win because he was old, even though he was the wbc champ, you say an old faded tired barerra was prime??? Because he was 29, but he had over 60 fn fights by the time pac beat him...did mayorga beat a prime 29 year old vargas too?

 

Let's get back on topic. You say I "boost up" Morales and Barrera.

What the hell does that mean?

 

It means you way overrate them. Barrera was overrated as hell, Morales was great in his prime, Pac never actually beat a prime Morales though, he beat a MOrales coming off a loss with no momentum.

 

Nah Duckler ain't a manny or floyd fan boy, it's funny how people accuse him of being both. If anything he's a brook fan boy, dude gets annoyed as hell when I post anything anti-brook, but he's not as bad as the usual brook fan, and can argue with reason.

 

Absolutely not. Barrera and Morales are bona fide ATG's.

 

Another thing, tinman....you boost up a faded morales because he beat a "prime" less skilled version of pacquaio, but then he goes on to lose to raheem, and now hes shot to **** in your opinion? Ever give thought to why theres that saying "styles makes fights"? Raheems style would have been nightmares for any version of morales, period....hence you boosting up morales, because he beat "prime" pacquaio, right..?

Mab gets boosted by you because he was a so called "prime 29 year old with 60+ fights", because he beat a 1 dimensional NAZ, A blown up bantamweight in tapia, arguably loses 2 out of 3 to faded morales, then gets fed to pacquaio and this is such a great win, but to the naked eye barerra was far from prime, and was not a focused fighter for that fight... i mean NAZ would have beat him that nite, cmon hence why youre boosting barerra....BECAUSE PACQUAIO BEAT A SO CALLED "PRIME VERSION, RIGHT??

 

You're making no sense. "Boosting up"

WTF is this?

 

Now what doeS IT mean when you say that the pac losses were great losses for EM AND MAB?

What the hell does that mean?

 

Making a win better then what it actually is man...get with the program, you always talk about the em and mab wins..it tired already

 

Extremely overrated. Give me the list of greats Barrera beat, and not shot to **** Tapia or Ayala in their mid 30's. Marquez > Barrera, he beat his ass too, and arguably was robbed every single time again Manny. He has one great win against Morales, the others were good, but not bonafide atg material. Marquez has a wins over manny and barrera so he rightfully should be far ahead. Morales I agree, but Pac didn'T beat the ATG version of Morales. He beat a drained Morales, and a one coming off a loss.

 

I'm trying to stay on topic here. You came out and said I "boost up" Morales and Barrera.

I'm still struggling to understand what that means, in all seriousness.

 

What wins??? I've said Morales and Barrera are great fighters.

You're not making any sense.

 

Cheers, mate! :good