Manny Pacquiao versus Salvador Sanchez.....

Read my last post....

You claim pac beat a pime mab?? But how can that be with all the wars hes fought, the 60+ compiled record of fights he had not to mention turning pro at 15!!!??? He worn the fuk out when pac beat him in 2003 wveryone knows this....stop boosting that win up as a great win...MAB was declining for fuks sake..

Do i have to explain how you think Morales is shot to **** because he fought a far technically fighter in zahir raheem too? 4 words for you.......he was not shot!

 

it's just funny how both sides keep accusing you .

 

Im just fuking with you ducky!!!:deal i know you like them zaghe creampies doe

 

Those are delicious :nod

 

I'm sorry man, but you lost me on the "boost up" part. And you just haven't been able to clear that one up for me.

 

:nod

 

He's saying that you are building them up to be greater than they were.

 

Who Morales and Barrera?

 

You never heard the term "boosting" somebody up?

 

Yep.

 

Those guys are great fighters.

 

Agreed beyond a shadow of a doubt. I believe Drenlou is debating the degree of greatness.

 

Em and barerra are great fighters, yes...

But he says EM was faded in the second pac fight, so how does that qualify as great win?? Was a faded chavez sr a greatwin for de la hoya too??

Mab was a tired 29, he had 60+ pro fights, turned pro at 15, fought in hellacious wars had issues in camp so how can that be a such a great win, when its clear he was on the decline?? Was a 29 year old Vargas a great win for Mayorga too?? I dont get that guy sometimes, hes fanboyish to me

 

It doesn't, but I have never said it did. Meanwhile you've said before that the second Erik Morales fight was Pacquiao's best performance.