How so?? I used to be a huge pacstooge and even then i knew that wasnt a prime barerra in the ring that night, its not hard to see.. it was a very good win doe..Em win over pacquaio was a better win then pac over Mab 1...sowwey
You may have once been a Pac fanatic but now you are a card carrying member of the Floyd fanatics. If it wasn't prime Barrera it was 95% prime Barrera which is a damn good win. :deal
It shouldnt even be about pac vs mab or em....tinman somehow always brings that up... thats how we get into these off topic debates man.. ive made this thread before, @nd sanchez would have beaten pac 9-10 times, he was just too good technically and well..... pac was just too damn wreckless
60+ fights, knocked out by junior jones, had wars with mckiney, and morales, burnt out at 29...... i dont see how all that would only deplete your prime 5%... he was more like 75% when pac beat him the first time, and about 80-85% percent for the rematch..
Barerra did way better in the rematch, so does pac get credit for beating a 100% better Mab in the rematch in your opinion? I mean if he was 95% in the first fight and got demolished he would of had to have been 100% for the second fight...:think
Sal is extremely overrated. Great boxer indeed, but the Mexicans(probably worse fans than even the brits) hold onto him like he was the goat because their other boxers dont live up to the expectation. Don't get me twisted though, dude has an amazing resume for his age, but he just gets put way up there due to his death, and the mystery of how much better he could have gotten.