Manny Pacquiao vs Hector Camacho @ 130lbs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by acb, Jun 12, 2008.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I do show up in those threads, check again
     
  2. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Look at the thread you pulled up to discredit my statement...

    What does the first post say?
     
  3. akoaypogi

    akoaypogi New Member Full Member

    88
    0
    May 19, 2008
    ACB - One more Question before I sleep - Is it true Hector Camacho was faster than the Flash? :rofl:rofl
     
  4. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Yes. They once had a h2h competition, and Camacho won going away.

    But they only posted the results on pacland, so you would have to go there to check.
     
  5. akoaypogi

    akoaypogi New Member Full Member

    88
    0
    May 19, 2008
    I knew it :nut
     
  6. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Camacho would've given him a boxing lesson I think. Pacquiao would be handily outsped for once.
     
  7. jaois138

    jaois138 Dinamita Full Member

    679
    0
    May 24, 2008
  8. joito3

    joito3 Active Member Full Member

    1,497
    1
    Mar 5, 2006
    Camacho's chin was iron man only time I ever saw him hurt was against Rosario and he still didn't go down....


    He took Chavez, Trinidad, and DLH best punches and was never knocked out .... he went down once against DLH but he got right back up and wasn't on ***** street more of a flash knockdown....also those fights were all except for the rosario fight at 140 & 147 which was not camacho's prime weight


    I don't see Pac getting past Macho's jab to be honest then you mix in the double and triple jabs, the lightning fast combos, uppercuts, body shots, camacho's ability to make you miss in mid combination and continue to fire at the same time ....

    I don't see pac winning more than 3 rounds if he is lucky ...

    Camacho's foot and handspeed just too much and Macho had POWER at 130 Pac could find himself staring at the lights from punches he never saw coming....

    Pac does the same thing over and over and over no way it will be effective against a devilishly smart speed demon in camacho at 130
     
  9. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Yes, due to Pac fighting fighters past their prime at 130 and having trouble with them. A draw with JMM and the lost to Morales. If Camacho was in his prime and fighting right now or when Pac beat the fab four, Camacho would win. His speed, accuracy, his one, two, his super uppercuts, stamina, lateral movement, and a great finisher places him over Pac at 130. Did I mention Camacho's chin. As far as Taylor, he was robbed. Taylor's speed was much different from Camacho's. Camacho used accuracy and Taylor just threw punches in bunches.
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I just noticed the Poll %.......its pretty much comparable to the % that had JMM winning over Pac in their rematch......
    ....which goes to show me that despite JMM leading handily in those polls, how loaded they were with just outright biased Pac fans!

    I mean you take this Camacho-Pac poll to the classic section, without allowing known Pac fans who rarely post in the classic section to vote, and you'd be hard pressed to find Pac even get close to 10% of the vote.


    Just a little mud to rub the *******s face with!:lol: :lol:

    I know its not a sporty thing to do, but I could'nt help myself rub some reality mud onto some domes!:yep :smooch
     
  11. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    That's cold.
     
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    You're only looking strictly at speed......

    There was a gap in speed between Chavez and Taylor to Taylor's favor......but the major factor that neatralizes that speed from Chavez, was his skill and know how.
    Chavez' skill imo was better than Taylor's, and eons better than that of Pacquiao's.

    Pac is no JC Chavez, in Chavez, he was the total package, alot of skill and very little weak points, that made up the difference that Taylor had in pure speed.
    That just is'nt the case with Camacho-Pac. As has been mentioned, you go down your own list you just laid down and the only advantage that Pac may have is in one shot punching power. I dont even think that Pac has the strenghth advantage, on the inside, Camacho imo pushes Pac around.

    Chavez had alot of other advantages over Taylor that wore on Taylor and eventually neutralized his speed.
    The type of advantages that are just not there for Pac over Camacho!
     
  13. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008

    Good post.
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    maybe this would change your opinion about pac not knowing how to duck and counter... :D

    This content is protected
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    i have a feeling that some people are voting for camacho here not solely on his accomplishments at 130 but also at higher weights. this thread specifically says at 130. he could have a great chin at higer weights because he was more settled in it and not draining. just look at cotto at 140 and at 147.