damn slow round, that's for sure. the camera angles weren't very good for some parts though but it looks like Pac landed more significant shots...
Not I. . . Those are the rounds where it's next to impossible to justify for Bradley. . . Rounds 1, and 11 were pretty clear Pac rounds IMO as well; but I guess if you tried hard enough you could give them to Bradley. . . I did think Bradley most definitely won round 2, and 10; and round 12 was 50/50, 60/40 Bradley, which I also gave to Bradley.
I had pac winning but the fight clearly wasn't a blowout the way harold lederman would suggest, he only gave Bradley 2 rounds. Bradley won at least 4rnds and arguably 5 or 6 rounds. Pac should've gotten the win but this is boxing WWE I can't remember when fair was fair in boxing.
I think pac won round 2 as well I think I gave one of the middle rounds to bradley and 11 was a toss up.
So if it's a "slow" round, Bradley automatically gets the benefit of the doubt even though the fool hardly ever landed a punch and was simply throwing "stay away from me" punches late rounds. GTFO. The reality is, if Pacquiao doesn't press the action, every round will be slow...none of these fools would want engage Pac after tasting that left. Pac bullied the bully.
I think the issues is pac took breaks and Tim picked up the work, if you were going to give Tim a round it would be those pac slow rounds. Old fighters tend to lose because the younger Guy out worked him. I don't think this was necessarily the case, there were some questionable rounds where pac would get the nod for his cleaner harder shots but pac took the first two minutes off in the round.
can someone justify how come round 8 goes to tim? I have watched that round 7 and 8 times just now and it is a close but clear Pacquiao round
There ya go. The non-HBO commentary team after 12 rounds.. "Bradley might win this." There's so much pro-Pacquiao bias it's unreal. Mass fanboy hysteria taking over. Nowhere close to a robbery.