Manny Pacquiao Won Rounds 3-9; Anyone who disagrees?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Jun 11, 2012.


  1. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    I thought 8 could arguably be Timmeh's round
     
  2. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    damn slow round, that's for sure. the camera angles weren't very good for some parts though but it looks like Pac landed more significant shots...
     
  3. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    Not I. . . Those are the rounds where it's next to impossible to justify for Bradley. . . Rounds 1, and 11 were pretty clear Pac rounds IMO as well; but I guess if you tried hard enough you could give them to Bradley. . .

    I did think Bradley most definitely won round 2, and 10; and round 12 was 50/50, 60/40 Bradley, which I also gave to Bradley.
     
  4. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    May 31, 2012
    I had pac winning but the fight clearly wasn't a blowout the way harold lederman would suggest, he only gave Bradley 2 rounds. Bradley won at least 4rnds and arguably 5 or 6 rounds. Pac should've gotten the win but this is boxing WWE I can't remember when fair was fair in boxing.
     
  5. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    he blitzed the 1st 9. then bradley won his 1st round in round # 10
     
  6. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    truly, round 8 is a pac round. He landed clearly and he is the harder puncher. Tim was hurt
     
  7. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    There could be an argument made for Tim in that round. I don't think Tim was hurt either.
     
  8. pourya

    pourya Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    0
    Sep 22, 2011
    agree

    he lost 1, 2, 12, 10

    rounds 11 was anyone but i gave it to the pacman
     
  9. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    5
    Aug 7, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9ilF3Y-cgs[/ame]
     
  10. Julien Sorel

    Julien Sorel New Member Full Member

    30
    2
    Dec 19, 2011
    I think pac won round 2 as well I think I gave one of the middle rounds to bradley and 11 was a toss up.
     
  11. PaoloMirani

    PaoloMirani Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,317
    1
    Oct 31, 2010
    So if it's a "slow" round, Bradley automatically gets the benefit of the doubt even though the fool hardly ever landed a punch and was simply throwing "stay away from me" punches late rounds. GTFO. The reality is, if Pacquiao doesn't press the action, every round will be slow...none of these fools would want engage Pac after tasting that left. Pac bullied the bully.
     
  12. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    May 31, 2012
    I think the issues is pac took breaks and Tim picked up the work, if you were going to give Tim a round it would be those pac slow rounds. Old fighters tend to lose because the younger Guy out worked him. I don't think this was necessarily the case, there were some questionable rounds where pac would get the nod for his cleaner harder shots but pac took the first two minutes off in the round.
     
  13. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    can someone justify how come round 8 goes to tim? I have watched that round 7 and 8 times just now and it is a close but clear Pacquiao round
     
  14. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    Well seeing as how Bradley was awarded the 5th round, it makes perfect sense.
     
  15. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    There ya go. The non-HBO commentary team after 12 rounds.. "Bradley might win this." There's so much pro-Pacquiao bias it's unreal. Mass fanboy hysteria taking over. Nowhere close to a robbery.