Manny's last 4 opponents have a combined record of 129-1!

the difference is Pac's win are elite

 

For you to believe that Bradley was undefeated means you also have to believe that Bradley beat Pacquiao in their first fight.

So which is it?

 

Yea it doesn't matter both way Pac beat a undefeated fighter Bradley was undefeated in the first fight as well.

Bradley got the "official win"

 

:verysad....

 

I almost spit my coffee when I read that. Seriously even trolls on this forum are uneducated as **** man.

 

Again not to discredit Manny but
Cotto coming off a stoppage loss with no trainer
Marquez who really won every fight.
Bradley who beat him the first fight.

 

And Floyd fought Cotto several years later. Floyd fighting Marquez after two wars with Pac, making him move up two divisions and still cheated him on the scales. Only retyrds thought bradley beat pacquiao either time.

 

What does Floyd have to do with Manny's opponent's.

He fought Cotto 3yrs after Pacquiao, as a PAC fan you yourself should know it takes time to recover from bad stoppages Manny hoped on Cotto coming off a bad loss with no trainer Floyd fought him coming off 3 stoppage wins with one of the best trainers.

Marquez got beat so bad he didn't even want a rematch. Think about that the only fighter Marquez has never wanted to fight again was Floyd.

And I can see both sides of the Bradley debate 8-4 PAC to 7-5 Bradley is cool with me. Pac-JMM III was a bigger robbery Marquez won 9rds vs Bradley Pacquiao struggled in both fight's

 

I don't know where that 1 comes from. Marquez had lost 6 times going into their last fight.