Mannys name belongs up there with Armstrong and the rest

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Nov 15, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,795
    51,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I went from way overrating him to underrating him a bit I think.

    Marquez is certainly a limiting factor for me - not just because of the KO though. I don't think Manny ever beat him and only one decision he recieved was even in a fight close enough, to me, to be reasonable (I still had it for Marquez!). These are matters of opinion though.

    Second, and I think it's worth mentioning - Pacquiao seemed to get bigger, faster, and more devastating to his bigger foes as he went. That's odd. I won't say he was a cheat, that seems unfair somehow, but I think it's definitely fair to say that moving up in weight is easier and therefore less impressive. Due to "modern nutrition" I suppose.

    I mean Pacquiao looked thick, muscular and just as fast with no fat as he moved through the divisions.
     
  2. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,794
    31,387
    Feb 25, 2015
    Actually that is false. Pacquiao was more physical in the lower weight classes. His competiton level also dropped off as he moved up in weight. He never fought anyone great past 130.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,795
    51,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    "More Physical" - what do you mean by that?

    What about Marquez, Hatton and Mayweather?
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, the Marquez fights are a blemish. Marquez brings him down to size. There's no getting round that. But I always give credit to great fighters who actually have 3 or 4 fights against their 'stylistic nemeses', when other great fighters have (wisely?) refused to entertain rematches with their most troublesome foes, or avenged a defeat then called it quits at 1-1.



    Yes, he got bigger. He was probably well juiced, but then Marquez's physique and power in fight 4 was just as remarkable or 'odd'.
    Anyway, the likes of Clottey, Margarito, Cotto were definitely a lot bigger than Pacquaio.
    Really, I always found his featherweight days the most impressive version, and perhaps the Oscar and Hatton fights.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,795
    51,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well Oscar was a corpse, but yeah, I'm not sure how anyone can fail to be impressed by that Hatton performance. That was absurd and deadly.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, one of the few times I thought, for a second, **** Have we just seen a man killed ?
     
  7. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,794
    31,387
    Feb 25, 2015
    More physical meaning stronger, faster, higher workrate. Its pretty obvious in his featherweight days that he was had a lot more of that stuff.
     
  8. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,794
    31,387
    Feb 25, 2015
    Why are the marquez fights a blemish. Pacquiao did actually beat a prime Marquez.

    Ali went life and death with Frazier.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,795
    51,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    He looks faster at welterweight to me, with hands. I think he got better at putting his punches together right up until the end, right up until he dropped off.

    He's clearly a better puncher overall in Marquez II than Marquez I, and there's no difference that I can see between II and III (welterweight).
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,795
    51,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, didn't the count start? Took him a weird moment to wave it off.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    They are a blemish is the sense that Marquez sits at least equal with Pacquiao, head to head, over the series.
    That lessens Pacquiao's general superiority in his era.
    But as I've already said, I have to give credit to Pacquiao for fighting his toughest opponent 4 times. A lot of the ATGs avoid such challenges, or time them or cherry-pick them.
     
  12. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,794
    31,387
    Feb 25, 2015
    Pacquiao had 12 knockouts in 13 fights at 122-126. Stopping even Ledwaba and Barrera.

    I thought IMO that he carried better power at the lower weights.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    Very great but he never ever proved himself a level above Marquez.

    Admittedly some greats do struggle with certain opponents but usually those struggles occur during a pre or post prime period (Jofre v Harada).

    Let's do the Griffith Test. Can anyone strongly argue without any room for doubt that Pacquiao deserves to be ranked above Emile Griffith?
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, the referee hesitated. Perhaps the KO was so real it must have looked unreal. I don't know, It was awesome, frightening stuff.
     
  15. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,794
    31,387
    Feb 25, 2015
    Marquez was his equal H2H or close to it.

    But Manny stopped Barrera who rates even higher than Marquez. So does that matter or not?