Manuel Charr first German world heavy champ since Max!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by crixus85, Nov 26, 2017.


  1. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,871
    Jul 21, 2012
    Ruiz held the real WBA belt and was a top 5 rated HW.
     
  2. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Charr's legitimacy is up there with Deontay's!
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Wait, you mean since Wlad. :thumbsup:
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  4. ipitythefool

    ipitythefool Prediction ? Pain Full Member

    6,710
    12,014
    Mar 17, 2017
    :ARMS1:Well said that man. There are far too many so called boxing fans that call these WBA regular "titles" bona fide world belts.

    They are nothing more than trinkets that We Be Awful buy from poundland and peddle to make yet more money.

    Charr is NOT a world champion.
     
  5. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,062
    768
    May 12, 2007
    i dont like deontay and think he is more media product than fighter.

    still, his legitimacy, as pathetic as it is is still a Million lightyears ahead of that pathetic bum charr. remember, charr is probably not even the toughest doner Kebab salesman in Germany.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  6. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,611
    Nov 5, 2013
    LMFAO, Charr is a joke and he will always be one. Deontay and Bermane (2015) would have knocked this sucker out.

    That being said, the last 6-7 opponents of Deontay would beat Manuel Charr LMFAO
     
  7. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004

    Top 5 heavyweight does not make him the champion.
     
  8. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,132
    39,611
    Sep 29, 2012
    Schulz has more merit of being an honorary titlist due to his performances against Botha, Foreman and Moorer than Charr does with this BS trinket.
     
    madballster and Big Ukrainian like this.
  9. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,132
    39,611
    Sep 29, 2012
    Ruiz was a fake and manufactured champion produced almost entirely Don King... Lewis was the REAL wba champ, he was stripped for refusing to face this fraud and instead taking on the more touted and undefeated Grant in a bigger fight.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,871
    Jul 21, 2012
    I never said he was , but he was a real champion while Charr is not.
     
  11. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004

    IMO there's a difference between a champion and a belt holder. Ruiz was a belt holder.
     
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,871
    Jul 21, 2012
    Depends on your angle or agenda. . Ruiz was WBA Champion.
     
  13. Dagnaldinho

    Dagnaldinho Active Member Full Member

    1,460
    1,535
    Sep 16, 2017
    I dont mind having multiple organisations, but im fully against regular and super champions, you have 1 world champion for your organisation and thats that.
     
    JeremyCorbyn likes this.
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Whatever, I don't have anything bad to say about the guy. Not a bad accomplishment for a guy who was almost shot to death two years ago.
     
    Big Ukrainian and dinovelvet like this.
  15. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004
    IMO if Boxer A unifies the major belts then relinquishes three of them because he doesn't want to pay 3 times the sanctioning fee. When Boxer B , Boxer C and Boxer D are not "the" champion. They're belt holders, meaning they're good enough to get a belt but not as accomplished as the true champion.