Manuel Charr first German world heavy champ since Max!

Lol what about Eubank jnr when he fought for his prized IBO belt,and on ITV pay per view lol,now if that ain’t a psy op I don’t what is as I’m sure this guy ducked Danny Jacobs for the WBA (not as good as Gennadys belt)title.
I’m sure there’s other examples worth looking at like the Charles Martin v Glazkov psy op and the resulting Martin v AJ psy op that followed

 

Lol why you have to go mention that,Wilder fans try and keep this one quiet as didn’t Rossey drop Stiverne in that fight and by all accounts should of won,I reckon Rossey could of knocked Stiverne out cold and the corrupt WBC would of found a way to make the Buffet King the winner to shoot him up those rankings.
Think hard on this one now,can you recall any Wilder fight where his opponent had more than a 80/20 chance of winning,the 80/20 being in favour of Wilder obviously and one could even say that’s being kind and that 99% of his fights have been more in the 90/10 range.
Jeez what a fraud Wilder is and yet for some reason going off this crap some say his power is real without him ever stepping up and that cause he KOd an overweight punching bag who threw back how many punches?

 

He's shockingly underrated. At least with Takam the underrating was due to the fact that most people didn't know WTF they were talking about, but with Charr there's genuine targeted downgrading. He's one of those guys who could beat a top name and rather than get praised for it have that top name called a washed up bum.

Charr's breaking new ground and people can't handle it.

 

He's already beaten Duhaupas (robbery loss) who many people consider Wilder's best opponent, so I'm not sure what you're finding so goddamn hilarious.

 

one evil doesnt veto another evil.

 

hes not beaten anyone, thats the actual point,


well done for reversing the facts though. "If" he beat a top fighter"!

 

No one's calling him one of the best in the division. But he's got some decent names on his resume.

Hence not a bum, which is what I'm arguing.

 

he has no decent names on his cv. You are talking about a few ancient fighters who should have been retired.

Whats with the lies, dude? I dont like being lied to.

 

He's not a bum, absolutely not, but he's not a proper world champion either.

 

hes not even a proper contender.

This is basically like giving Gary Cornish a world title.

 

Doubt Charr hits that much harder than Stiverne or Molina.

 

The link I posted is from the WBA's website clearly stating they granted special permission to make this fight for the full WBA regular title. I'm not sure what else you need to prove it was for the WBA title?

Here's another link below saying clearly that Charr/Ustinov was for the WBA belt, not interim or eliminator. So that's 2 pages from the WBA website saying it's for the full title.

http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions-profiles?id=1501#.Wh2Zpkpl-00http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions-profiles?id=1501#.Wh2Zpkpl-00

But yeah Charr is garbage and his belt is worthless as Joshua is the real WBA champion.

 

Id pick Charr to ko Joshua's stiff ass. ****en bigot.

 

it would help your case if he started with the "proving them wrong" bit first.