Manuel Charr vs Billy Joe Saunders for the world heavyweight Championship

In that case i have to go with Billy Joe because Manuel Charr is utter garbage and too slow to handle southpaw
gypsy slickness, he doesn't have that in him.

BJS by wide UD.

 

He'd chicken out before the first bell.

 

Yea they only problem is Ruiz had the only WBA belt at the time..

Now Mendoza has to pay back his Prostitute and drug debt to the cartel there’s about to be 3 WBA HW belts..

So BJ has to fight AJ

 

Superb 120-108 Diamond Boy, easy.

 

Wasn't the heavy limit like 190 back in Roy's days? Saunders would be carrying an extra 5KG today, that's a lot of weight on his frame for a guy who ain't naturally fast like Jones.

Charr is garbage, like really garbage... but he'd catch Saunders eventually. Still a 6'4 heavy.

 

Correct, the borderline was redrawn between cruiser and heavy in 2004. Jones vs. Ruiz was in 2003.

 

Sumo Saunders wins a majority decision.

 

Fair play.

Do people think Seferi would beat Saunders?

 

That makes no difference in this case. It would be a heavyweight contest as long as Charr came in over 200.

 

There are no current MWs, SMWs, or LHWs that could go up in weight and beat a current
top 5 HW. Hell not even a top 10 or 15 HW.

Size matters.............no homo

 

you forgot "and if charr had the world title"

not sure which one is more unlikely to be fair. I'd suggest BJ winning a HW title would be more likely than Charr getting one in his career, but its close, both incredibly unlikely.

 

what about that guy called CJ on this forum, does he come into equation with BJ and AJ.

 

Saunders would beat Charr even as a MW. lol