Marciano (and his predecessors) would probably get KTFO today

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kotjinx, Nov 15, 2008.


  1. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Possible, or we just don't measure it well...

    I followed your first link. Nolan Ryan tops the ranking with a speed of 108.1. Read the fine print and you'll find that today's pitch speeds are measured from 50 feet away from the plate, but Ryan's was measured at 10 feet. Could that have something to do with the differences ;) (and the official Guiness world record is lower at 100.8 mph - casting further doubt on what these guys do).

    Anyway, I think the question of why records have been increasing across the board (if that's true) and how long it can continue is an interesting one. Could be just me, though.
     
  2. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    The title of the thread was deliberately provocative, but underlying it was my belief that boxers today are fitter than they were years ago. I thought that this would probably affect the outcome of many fights. Some of the arguments used have left me less certain about that than I was (which didn't stop me from playing devil's advocate, naturally).

    Most notably:

    1) Focusing on athletics to back my argument was probably misleading because:
    a) running was much less popular than it is now (the opposite has happened in boxing);
    b) I was comparing runners who were effectively amateurs with current professionals; this does not apply to boxing which became a professional sport early in the XXth century - i.e. gains in fitness are probably vastly overestimated by this example;
    c) there is some evidence that sports other than running (vide baseball) might not have seen similar gains in performance.

    2) Past great boxers fought more often (at least if we disregard amateur careers) and probably against an, on average, higher level of opposition. There were no sanctioning bodies and people went into fights against opponents demanded by the public - as opposed to dodgy challengers found by crooked sanctioning bodies. The experience of more 'real' fights could have given past champions an edge over today's boxers.


    3) The fact that boxing has lost popularity - and is now considered a dangerous sport - means that the pool of talent that current boxers are drawn from is probably much shallower. This is likely to affect the average level of boxers and so affect the overall level of the discipline.

    Thanks to all of you - most notably McGrain - for the discussion.
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Yeah, those old timers sure couldn't hang with their modern counterparts, just too lacking physically. Guys like Marciano and Armstrong were only fighting the full 3 minutes of every round for 15 rounds straight, while modern elites with the advantage of modern technology like De La Hoya can't go 9 rounds without gassing. No doubt about it, modern fighters are just on another level as far as fitness.:roll:
     
  4. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    While you're partially preaching to the converted, some bits I just don't buy.

    First differences in size would be difficult to get over - that's hard to argue against.

    Second, you're comparing past legends to a guy who's certainly past his prime. It's like me focusing on Sugar Ray Robinson's last ten fights (five of which were losses) to claim that as soon as he started fighting 'modern day' opponents he started loosing... What's the point?
     
  5. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004
    I think of it like this; more heavyweights fighting today, plus they are much bigger and stronger than their counterparts from days-gone-by and we can't judge how yesterday's heavyweights would take a punch from a 6'-5" monster who can actually punch like hell instead of a behemoth who was huge do to a glandular disorder. I think the current heavyweights would expose more oldtimers than I care to mention. In fact, I'd say Haye would dominate many bygone eras whereas he's kind of on the iffy side today. BTW, I think the smaller weight fighters of old times probably would have a better chance of being better than their modern counterparts than the heavyweights.
     
  6. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    If Kotjinx is saying that a modern-day heavyweight/cruiserweight might defeat Marciano strictly by virtue of his size, then it's instructive to note that Louis was 6'2", and with a 76 inch reach, and superlative punching technique, would likely have been as much of a factor as Evander Holyfield at heavyweight.

    It's also instructive to note that all of Louis's losses came at the hands of smaller opponents, and that he did rather well against the fighters who matched the dimensions of the Klitchsko's (Buddy Baer and Abe Simon).
     
  7. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Old timers technique was horrible, but you will find 1000 guys coming out of the woodwork to argue that Jack Johnson would destroy Tyson in two rounds. It's a joke, but you'll never convince them otherwise.
     
  8. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Max Schmeling doesn't knock out ANY modern-era HW champ. EVAR.
     
  9. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Foreman's punching technique was as aesthetically displeasing as it gets, and he was still in contention until well into the late 90's.
     
  10. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Oh...I think Schmeling would have had as much of a field day with Leon Spinks as Gerrie Coetzee did.
     
  11. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
  12. eltorrente

    eltorrente Active Member Full Member

    1,231
    1
    May 18, 2006
    How can modern fighters be considered more talented, when the talent pool that they are drawn from is so much smaller?!?!

    Back in the day, there were boxing gyms around every corner. Boxing was a HUGE sport and so many atheletes got into boxing in an attempt to make a living and escape the streets.

    Nowadays, boxing gyms are few and far between, and most good atheletes are heading into other sports. I think the best possible modern HW is actually a power-forward in the NBA, or a line-backer in the NFL - but he probably never even stepped foot in a boxing gym, let alone put gloves on or thought of training and pursuing it.
    This content is protected



    The numbers of boxers back in the day were much greater, and those who rose to the top were enormously talented - much more so than the 30 punch a round fat-asses that are winning championships today. Big guys like Shannon Briggs that can't throw 10 punches without collapsing, or Ruiz who doesn't punch at all, or a fat, out of shape middle-weight like Toney are examples of those who can rise to the top in the modern era. NO WAY they could rise to the top 30 or more years ago!
     
  13. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    I think they calibrated for that but if you other articles you will see that old timers before Ryan were measured from much further distances than today but actually with more accurate equipment. Plus, quite a few posters claim the calibrations today are rigged more but who knows.

    There is also evidence that we are degenerating in various ways.
    http://www.onelife.com/evolve/degen.html

    [FONT=&quot]1950's writers were better writers but then languages always seem to devolve.
    [/FONT][FONT=&quot]http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3643/is_199501/ai_n8711702/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    Fossil man was 12 to 25 % lager than modern man and their brains were much bigger to.
    This content is protected


     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    That only applies for HW's. And there's a lot more to boxing than size, I figure anyone with the faintest knowledge and understanding of the sport would know that.

    Oscar's been that way since he was in his prime, since the days of his fights with Quartey and Trinidad. There are exceptions to the rule in every era, but the fact that old timers went 15 rounds on a daily basis, a lot of them fighting with more of an energy consuming style, surely should give you some perspective.

    That would be a very inept comparison, considering I just explained the De La Hoya situation and Robinson was far older and further past his best than De La Hoya has been the past few years anyway.
     
  15. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Good post and I might add that it is also possible that today's and yesterday's baddest dudes never played any professional sports at all