Marciano Harder Hitter than Lennox Lewis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by OLD FOGEY, Oct 3, 2007.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    Would Byrd?
     
  2. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    Very interesting, but you are assuming that both Lewis and Marciano represent the max of their respective weights--In boxing, though, so many other factors come into play. Lewis may have outperformed the other 232 pounders because he had superior defense and movement, a better chin, or more stamina. So he might not haved maxed out at his weight. If I read you right, you are saying the theoretical difference is only 10%. It is certainly not out of reason that if a Marciano, or a Dempsey or Langford, maxed out punching power at their weights, they could have made up the difference over a man of Lewis' size if Lewis in fact is not the top puncher of his weight but falls more than 10% short.
     
  3. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    When did Lewis go fifteen rounds?

    Lewis never scored a knockout after the 8th round, and only three after the 6th. Charles should simply move and duck to survive the first half of the fight and maybe even to the 10th, and take Lewis in deeper than he is used to.
     
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    Assuming the Olympic figures accurately represent the difference between boxers' punching power, it is conceivable that Marciano hit harder if Lewis represents a lower percentile of punchers.
     
  5. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    That is the point that Janitor has argued for Dempsey and Langford, and he has gotten a lot of flak for it.
     
  6. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    Langford is a smaller fighter than Dempsey, however.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    This post I actually buy except Pyrros Dimas is a P4P beast so the figures for a 180lbish man is a little misleading.

    Also it doesnt take into account body mass, fist size, body weight, which contribute to a massive punch.

    I'd say its a little more nearer 75-80%

    Also Marciano isnt as an explosive puncher as Lennox for me. dempsey is a more explosive puncher and puts forward a better argument
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    ANOTHER MASSIVE POINT!!! Marciano wore much smaller gloves, which mean a greater impact and power transition
     
  9. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Marciano biggest guys where equivalent to lewis's smallest guys, it is harder to knock out a bigger man this again is a fact. MIke tyson when slow and old couldn't dent brian mcbride or danny willimas despite hitting them with some big shots. If tyson had hit a much smaller guy with equal talent to either of those guys they would be koed, do you agree ?
     
    ascended likes this.
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    I would agree that Dempsey is a much better example. Marciano is more of an endurance athlete than Dempsey.

    With Pyrros Dimas, I will only note that he represents the same "peak" of his talent pool as guys like Reza Zadeh do for theirs. He is a P4P phenomenon partially because his "weightclass" must be relatively more efficient.

    Body mass may matter, though the same force applied to different body masses will produce the same total force output. (In other words, if Marciano was as strong as Lewis, his punching power would be the same, since Lewis would need to use more force to get his body moving in the first place). On the other hand, it does bring up the concept of leverage, which Olympic lifters don't have to deal with to the same degree.
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    It may hold true to some degree, but a 200 lb. Holyfield has a better chin than Vitali, Wlad, Bowe, or Lewis.
     
  12. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    Marciano is well both ahead of both Lewis and Dempsey on knockout percentages no matter how you cut it--champions, contenders, men over 200 lbs, etc.
    The knockouts of Layne, Louis, Matthews, and Walcott look plenty explosive to me.
     
  13. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Yes there are exception's and note i said two smaller guys with the same talent as mcbride and williams.
     
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    Danny Williams isn't really a big guy. And if Tyson ran up against a smaller, quicker guy with the same overall talent and power as McBride, he may still have lost. In that case, it may also be a matter of Tyson specifically having the wrong style at that age for dealing with a guy like Kevin.
     
  15. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Also if you use the gloves as another point in mma were they user smaller gloves a knockout is quite likely even though they are allowed to grapple as well, boxing gloves are known to cushion blows and thats why people complain about brain damage etc. The gloves marciano used where alot lighter and smaller, put lewis in the same gloves and does he have faster ko's ?
     
    ascended likes this.