Marciano-I Just Don't Understand It

This is far more true than many are able to admit.

 

Maybe someone should remind the genius Holmes wa a beat by another 5”10 guy with a short reach sigh. Once again stupidity. Maybe the 20 pounds was all the difference what do I know. Just don’t tal about the light heavy weight that beat him either that won’t jive

 

Maybe someone should remind posters that bringing up amateur results is the epitome of intellectual dishonesty when commenting on prime fighters.

 

Just as I expected. NO BALLS! Don't waste anymore of my time put me on ignore ,you're pathetic!

 

Mike tyson was an amateur?

 

Maybe someone should remind the numberone chief Rock

Maybe someone should remind the Chief Rockista here that
1.Holmes was coming out of 2 years retirement.
2.He was 38 years old.
3.Tyson was 30lbs heavier than Marciano.
4.Tyson was three times faster than Marciano.
5.Tyson had 3 inches reach on Marciano.
6.How does a 2 years retired, 38years old Marciano do against Tyson?
Sometimes the truth doesn't merely hurt,sometimes it can be absolutely agonising!!!LOL

 

Yes he and many others are. Intellectual dishonesty at its finest. There are rules to Marciano threads here. You can bring up nonsensical fights when he wasn’t prime to try and argue he would lose a fight. You can claim he will lose a fight on cuts despite never losing a fight on cuts. You can also claim he didn’t have power despite only having six men in history who have knocked out men sooner. Trolls and dishonest ones at that

 

Two inch reach and 25 pounds. But it kind of blows away your height and reach argument. Despite that how did Holmes do the rest of his career? He did ok. But I unlike you won’t bring up a mans worst fight like you like to bring up cockle and Moore. Holmes was an ATG and deserving of respect but he loses to Tyson every time imo

 

Lol coming in at the number one spot!!! Watch out Chok and Undefeated!

 

30lbs and Tyson's reach was71 inches, that's 2 out of 2 wrong!
I mean this in all sincerity and without malice Mate ,on the subject of Marciano you are good for a laugh ,but never to be taken seriously!

 

Waste my time with you ?

Dude i said why i think rocky gives holmes problems.

I never said rocky beats holmes. I just said its possible . this isn't no blowout.

As who wins betweens holmes and marciano is up for debate.

I just said stylistically i give rocky the advantage.

Its like if that hurts you or something. .

You hate that rocky is great and try to put down his accomplishments whenever you can .


Like it or not ...


49-0 only

Highest KO percentage in heavyweight history.

#Recognize

#Dont hate appreciate

 

Chok has the capacity to disappear up his own rectum in his efforts to spin facts.
Lach is strident, but never as totally rabid and irrational ,not to mention emotionally butt hurt as you.

 

I take that as a compliment. Coming from the guy who spends his whole day degrading the man every chance he gets. What does that make you? I love the spin you put on it too. “I think he’s a great champ” gtfoh if you did you’d just leave a simple statement like I think he would lose because of x y z. But you never give that. always Have to attempt to belittle other posters if they dare disagree with you. Heaven forbid they are off by half an inch or so as if that kind of dribble determines the outcomes of fights.

 

No you didn't you totally ducked giving your reasons , and I quite understand why .one give-away was you saying to land an uppercut on the shorter Marciano his opponent would have to crouch.
That in itself tells me you dont know WTF you are talking about when it comes to boxing.
Basically you are just a Rocky fan boy ,full up with half truths and myths,nothing wrong with that , its harmless in itself and not illegal,but their are posters here who have ,practised , watched, read, and written about boxing for longer than you have been alive.
You might want to remember that before you make any more ignorant comments !

 

I recommend Anusol!