marciano v moore, has anyone seen the unedited rocky knock down?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by choklab, Feb 15, 2010.


  1. fightpro

    fightpro New Member Full Member

    2
    0
    Feb 15, 2015
    I saw the 2nd round in a Marciano documentary when I was a kid in the late 60's to early 70's. The ref led Marciano to the middle of the ropes away from the side of the ring he was knocked down on. He then went to Marciano's left, and argued with Marciano's corner (for no reason) against those ropes. Marciano was glassy eyed, and wobbly. The ref looked over his shoulder at Marciano, and he was still glassy eyed after 20-30 secs. He went back to arguing with the corner for another 20-30 secs then Marciano's eyes cleared, and he stopped wobbling. The ref went to Marciano touched his gloves, and the fight resumed. Moore was not lying or mistaken etc. What he has said is the absolute truth. The round has been edited on all the internet videos I have seen. I remember this like I saw it yesterday!
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,092
    Jun 2, 2006
    No one so far seems to know why Marciano went to the ropes when he got up .I do.:good
     
  3. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    To the OP and the original question--yes, I have seen the uncut version. There is a kinescope tape of the theatre TV feed of the bout which was shown on ESPN and is currently on youtube. The total bout runs about 38 minutes with the original commentary and sound. One can hear the timekeeper counting for the knockdowns.

    The 2nd round begins at 7:13 and ends at 10:13, exactly 3 minutes. The tape is obviously from one camera and there are no cuts or apparent editing.

    Moore hits Marciano with his right and drops him at 7:40. Marciano goes to his knees but rises almost immediately. He is on his feet by 7:42. He steps to the ropes and turns and nods in the direction of his corner at 7:43. The referee DOES NOT CLEAN HIS GLOVES AT ALL and waves him back to the fight at 7:44.

    Moore had retreated on his way to a neutral corner, but never got there as Marciano rose so quickly. Moore was actually standing by the side ropes.

    Moore begins moving toward Marciano, and Marciano begins moving toward Moore. They meet at center ring. Moore throws a hellacious uppercut which Marciano avoids or which just misses at 7:46. a total of six seconds after the knockdown.

    I did a bit of on-line research and found that Kessler wrote an autobiography and was quoted from it as saying he did not wipe Marciano's gloves because the ring was still clean of resin. Whatever, the kinescope shows that he did not wipe Marciano's gloves. Moore was behind Kessler and might not have been able to see what was happening.

    Bottom line--a knockdown and being waved back into action in four seconds seems to be as fast as it could possibly go to me. The timekeeper can be heard on the soundtrack with the count and Marciano is on his feet at "two" and being waved back into action at "four"

    *My take watching it, with the only view from one side of the ring, is that it was a flash knockdown and Marciano never seems badly hurt. He defends himself well when he and Moore come together six seconds after the knockdown.

    **as for 30 or 60 second delays--well, post a ringside report about that. No one noticed? Such a memory merely shows how unreliable forty or fifty year old memories are.

    ***I watched this tape several times yesterday and today for this post.
     
  4. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004


    :good good work
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    This is what really happened.

    http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=/&gl=GB#/watch?v=_pPfPUQopfg
    In a conventional sense Rocky was awful. I think this is what people can't get past. They look at him and see what appears to be the wildness and cannot entertain this at all in an ATG regard. It must be a poor era, old small men etc etc

    If this was true even the power and durability would not be enough but still they rationalise even this point and decide only a poor era could explain such dominance.

    I think the truth is Rockys style, what is seen as technical flaws, all worked for him in a completely unconventional way. I think it's easier to accept that this Rocky was a one off, an unconventionally effective fighter of real talent and substance who knew what he was doing. He just did not do it in the conventionally aesthetic way that looks smooth or as pleasing to the eye.

    He was a great fighter because it worked for him. Rocky had undeniable success of the highest possible echelon. He just does not look like what is most people's idea of a great fighter.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,092
    Jun 2, 2006
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Why do you think he went to the ropes?
     
  8. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,446
    Jun 25, 2014
    Man, Marciano was just awful. His style worked when he was the same size or bigger than his opponents. But he never jabbed his way in. He'd just jump in with wide hooks, and since everyone was around the same size, it didn't matter as much. And he hit so hard he'd win.

    But the big heavyweights with good jabs who came after him would've mopped the floor with Rocky. He never would've even been competitive.
     
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Do you think Marciano would have been better jabbing his way in?


    With those arms?


    I think Rocky was successful because he was so unconventional. When a fighter jabs his way in it can be successful but it can also present a pattern for the opponent to follow. Nobody could follow what he did.

    His opponents had to get near to Rocky to punch down on him. It was harder to keep Marciano at range than it looked.

    Those wide, weird punches looked awful but Rocky knew when to pull the trigger and it worked for him. Rocky got away with all of his awkward crude stuff against some of the finest technicians in boxing because he was unpredictable.

    The fighters that came after him were not better technically than the men Marciano beat. They were bigger but not as fast or as experienced. A lot of twenty fight contenders contested (and won) alphabet belts in the 1980s. I don't think anyone can be that certain about Marciano being out of his depth. He was an unusual specimen.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,092
    Jun 2, 2006
    Marciano told Peter Wilson of the Daily Mirror he was under the impression he was entitiled to a compulsory 8 count, forgetting that rule was waved for title fights.
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,446
    Jun 25, 2014
    Unconventional works when you're looking a guy in the eye and always in punching range.

    When you're staring at a guy's navel and giving up a foot in reach, forget it.

    Sometimes timing is everything. Rocky came up at the absolute perfect time.
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yes I have the same book. Rocky did not get any extra time like Archie believed did he?

    A lot of knocked down fighters walk toward a corner on instinct. Patterson against Johannson, Holmes always did it. Sometimes they know why they do it and sometimes they don't. In the heat of the moment I don't think they remember the rule meeting that we'll.
     
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I would have loved to see Rocky fight valdes and Baker just to put our minds at rest that he could deal with the 80" reach. I am confident he would have won those fights. The problem is had he taken then he would be crucified today for not fighting Charles and Moore.

    To fight in the gyms and be around the trainers of those days, gain the experience of competative journeymen from all the fight clubs that were still around then (less cannon fodder when there were lower level circuits for each level of fighter) how ever a fighter looked the competition a fighter honed his craft on was worth a bit more than folks realise. Competition was hot. There was a lot more fighters to climb over. But Rocky broke through all f that. He made the grade.

    Whilst Rocky was groomed as well as any champion he would have been exposed so much earlier if he was not special. There were so many other bigger, stronger more conventional heavyweights to back but they backed him because he had something.
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    problem was Baker and Valdes were eliminated and size was not really a big thing back then but I agree it would have been a bonus. Louis was about 6'1.5 and he dominated the big guys, Walcott and Charles and Moore and Johnson beat a few of them as well. Moore was considered the crafty danger....too bad Valdes lost to the 5'10 Satterfield and Baker to Moore and Bob S., Valdes would have been # 50 for Rocky but was beaten badly by Bob Satterfield...It would have been a nice bonus
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,092
    Jun 2, 2006
    Bummy Box Rec has Satterfield at 6'2". Rocky beats Valdes and Baker , but it would have been nice to have those names on his belt.