Marcianos 3 minute bomb run on the durable Don Cockell

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Aug 20, 2018.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,517
    28,721
    Jun 2, 2006
    Cockell was a light hitter and an average boxer with average speed and average boxing ability.
    He was in the right place at the right time, if he had been born in the US no one would have heard of him.
    I think this thread has run it's course.
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Yep...he may have been a decent middleweight or light heavyweight but he was certainly no world class heavyweight..

    But marciano fans love to pump him up into something he was not
     
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,566
    Jan 30, 2014
    It just occurred to me: This three-minute-long clip probably makes the case for Marciano being considered an attrition fighter as effectively as any footage I've ever watched.
     
    escudo and mcvey like this.
  4. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,630
    Mar 17, 2010
    Not for me.

    For me an attrition fighter takes everything away from you with constant pressure, and grinds you down with sheer volume of medium/light punches.

    Marciano does the former, but not the latter.

    Armstrong is the ideal candidate for the attrition puncher.

    Wilders been in long fights too, where he was constantly landing big punches.
    I don't consider him an attrition puncher simply because of fight length and punch volume. Such is the case with every great power puncher in the divisions history.

    If you look at Marcianos entire body of work, as opposed to boldly moving goal posts based off a couple of performances, you'll see the numerous early fight finishes, and one punch KOs. Cockell was enduring some seriously heavy skull shaking bombs. Marciano showed his power in the fight, evidenced by the film. And Marciano had very good early fight finishing ability and one punch knockout power, as evidenced by his resume.

    I'm not convinced that one can take that away from him by deviating to one small aspect of his career.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2018
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,566
    Jan 30, 2014
    I think it's important that we all recognize that Cockell surviving Marciano's onslaught wasn't nearly as much of an anomaly as some people make it seem. Marciano reached the top of the sport in 1950, when he first became a ranked contender. I think it's kind of revealing that a full two-thirds of his fights in the 50s (16 of 24) went past the halfway mark. This includes his fights against the likes of:

    C0ckell (bloated MW/LHW who'd been stopped by unimpressive smaller men),
    Art Henri (184-lber with a losing record went 8+ rounds),
    Willis Applegate (11-14 196lber who went the distance),
    Keene Simmons (8-8-1 fighter)
    Ted Lowry (180-lber with 50+ losses who'd been knocked out by Rusty Payne in 7)
    Johnny Shkor (aging fighter who'd been stopped by Walcott in 1 and Sid Peaks in 2)
    Buonvino (had been knocked out by lightheavyweight Nick Barone in 3 in his previous fight)

    This list gives lie to the insinuation that the C0ckell fight is some aberration or outlier that we can just ignore. These guys are small, unimpressive heavyweights who somehow managed to withstand sustained beatings from Marciano, before succumbing in the later rounds of their fights. IMO, any reasonable, honest attempt to classify Marciano and his punching power needs to address and explain these types of facts. Either he didn't hit quite as hard as the biggest proponents of his punching power claim, he didn't have the boxing ability to end these fights sooner, and/or he was somehow carrying these opponents despite appearing by all measures to be doing everything in his power to inflict maximum damage upon them. Something's gotta give though.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2018
    mcvey and reznick like this.
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,630
    Mar 17, 2010
    That's a good, and honestly compelling analysis.

    Ted Lowry was a negative type fighter, and a very dangerous "journeyman" defensive type opponent, much like perhaps Augustus.
    However that one example doesn't detract much from your overall point.

    An honest way to address these facts, in my opinion, and from my standpoint, would be to ask how his peers performed under the same guidelines?

    How did Tyson, Louis, Wlad, Lewis, Foreman, Frazier, Liston, Dempsey do in terms of fight length after becoming top 10 contenders?

    If such an analysis shows a gap between Marciano and all the other names above, I think I'd have to change my mind.
     
    mrkoolkevin and SuzieQ49 like this.
  7. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,716
    8,212
    Feb 11, 2005
    London lost to worse fighters than DC and tended to bleed all over the place. Cooper also bled from time to time, so it's no guarantee that his skin stays intact against Cokkell.

    Berbick should win, but I will note performed woefully against an ordinary ST Gordon and could run hot and cold. Bugner could wipe out DC like he did against Dunn...or fight passively and allow DC to outwork him. It's not like he didn't allow other, less talented fighter to beat him from time to time.

    And, even close to his prime, Leon allowed guys like Eddie Lopez to hold him to a draw.
     
    choklab likes this.
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,639
    Dec 31, 2009
    Haha. That’s Mcvey for you.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2018
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,639
    Dec 31, 2009

    Yes even guys like Renaldo Snipes were out-hustled in their prime by guys like Scott Frank who was unlucky to only get a draw with Snipes. He won that fight.

    If you want to look for the worst performance in a title challenge you will find guys rated higher than Don Cokkell. Who’s to say Don, who gave it everything, couldn’t beat those better guys on these weak, half hearted efforts?

    Some of the most appalling efforts in world title challenges were from all time greats.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,517
    28,721
    Jun 2, 2006
    "My best punches didn't seem to affect him."
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,517
    28,721
    Jun 2, 2006
    London wasn't a bleeder ,and he beat.
    Folley who is better than anyone Cokkell ever beat , a ranked contender
    Rischer ranked contender
    McNeeley title challenger
    Erskine Euro Champ beat Cooper
    King fringe contender
    Johnson fringe contender who beat Cooper
    Lave who beat Cokkell
    Rademacher title challenger
    Young Jack Johnson ranked contender

    Was London ever knocked out by a 162lbs boxer?
    Was he ever knocked down 3 times and stopped by a boxer weighing 174lbs?
    Bugner never lost to a fighter of the class of Cokkell when he was anywhere near his prime.
     
  12. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,628
    May 13, 2014
    My second favorite PRIDE fight behind only Diaz vs Gomi.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  13. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    59,493
    79,308
    Aug 21, 2012
    Apparently parts of Japan actually came to a standstill when it was broadcast on TV.
     
  14. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,628
    May 13, 2014
    https://i.imgur.com/PVFV5gR.mp4 I always stop what I'm doing when ever I see that collar tie.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,517
    28,721
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't accept an attrition fighter necessarily has to be a light hitter. Armstrong wasn't by the way .and neither was Frazier whom I would classify as an attrition fighter. Wilder? He doesnt throw nearly half as many punches as Rocky did,[if he did he would be seriously ****ed after 6 rds!]and doesnt throw that many bombs per round he uses a lot of pretty soft jabs and doesn't swing for the fences until he has his man going.
    His punch stats are pretty poor.
    Rocky's "one punch ko's" ?Lets have a look at a couple.
    Layne .He had his belly and ribs bombarded with sledge hammer shots until he was ready to go.
    Walcott.He had begun to resort to the ropes to save his legs ,older/tired fighters often do,he was still well in the fight and in front but beginning to ship more punishment as the punches just kept coming.
    Mathews. A great left hook ko,but he was a lhvy and overated anyway.
    Would you give Frazier the same kudos for koing Foster as Quarry?

    Others?
    Moore was ground down
    Lastarza was ground down
    Louis was ground down
    Charles was ground down
    Cokkell was ground down
    Marciano hit plenty hard and he did it althrough a fight ,but his accuracy left a lot to be desired.
    However he made up for it with his sheer intensity ,and relentlessness plus his superlative conditioning meant he could maintain his steady remorseless pace and top power all night.
    Stating these facts does not make us haters or imply we wish to **** on his formidable achievements.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2018
    Cecil likes this.