Marco Antonio Barrera vs. Alexis Arguello

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by punch13, Apr 4, 2008.


  1. punch13

    punch13 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,523
    0
    Jan 14, 2007
    Two guys who love to punch and go to war. Who wins between Marco Antonio Barrera and Alexis Arguello? Prime vs. Prime here.

    Please vote, it's a poll :)
     
  2. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Dios mio.

    Have to go with Arguello here. Long jab, dictating distance and pace, capitalizing on Barrera's tendency to trade with perfectly timed right hands.
     
  3. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    i got alexis by a ko in 10 to big too strong

    and very skilled .
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    isn't barrera's prime 122/126 while arguello's prime was at 130?
     
  5. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    im going by 130
     
  6. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,596
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
    arguello.
    too big and skilled
     
  7. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    PRYOR:huh
     
  8. nighthunter

    nighthunter Active Member Full Member

    728
    0
    Apr 3, 2007
    Arguello was too big
    barrera's prime is at 122-126
     
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Arguello would demolish MAB at 130 lbs, I'm with the consensus here that Arguello has too many physical advantages.....its a more competitive fight at 126 lbs, where it would take the skinny framed Arguello a bit longer to stop MAB!


    When you really think about it, Arguello is a stronger, harder punching, better version of Erik Morales......and those fights MAB went life and death with!
     
  10. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    Mab defeatd em tactically. Life and death? At least he won. It's the same thing when he should have won against jmm. Like what the mab fans says.
     
  11. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    And he would have beaten Marquez too.
     
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    At 130 lbs, yes I would favor Arguello, I'd probably pick him by late stoppage.
    .....at 126 lbs, its a pick'em fight imo, I think I'd even lean toward a JMM win there.
    JMM has better strenghth and stamina than MAB, and so that imo would be a factor.
    Arguello was still great at 126 lbs, but he did'nt really develop and mature as a fighter until he was fighting at a much better weight for his size body until he stepped up to 130 lbs.

    No question in my mind though.....Arguello at 130 lbs was too much of a fighter for the likes of MAB, JMM, Morales and Pac. Arguello was just to big for all of them.
     
  13. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    MAB was no where near prime at 130. Even if he was....Arguello is a bit better fighter IMO. Far too strong for MAB. Only Mayweather should be in the ring with Arguello at 130 (for the guys who actually fought here, obviously Armstrong and others who skipped the weight but fought both over and under it would have some say)
     
  14. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,114
    4
    Jan 8, 2007
    alexis was a full bodied super feather, he was huge for that weight. too much of a size advantage to go with an ATG skill set. mab would'nt be able to box with him, which leaves him the option of turning it into a fight. he'd have some success in spots, but even on the inside where barrera thrives, arguello (an underrated body puncher) woud come off better.

    Arguello KO/TKO 8-12
     
  15. Bystander

    Bystander Sensible Kibitzer Full Member

    552
    0
    Apr 2, 2008
    same here:good