Marco Huck Vs Tyson Fury At Heavyweight-Could Huck Shock The World And Topple Fury?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Jan 2, 2016.


  1. GBoxingFeed

    GBoxingFeed Active Member Full Member

    1,146
    1,004
    Sep 24, 2013
    As much as I respect Huck, I would see ending this up the same way as Klitschko vs Povetkin - albeit in a different manner...if that makes sense...

    Huck coming forward, being brave and trying to rattle Fury - Fury staying calm and jabbing him half to death on the way in, and unleashing power shots from time to time. Marking up and bloodying and exhausting Huck. On the inside, Fury mauls and roughs up Huck.

    Huck goes down a few times and loses wide on the cards, or gets finished in the latter third out of exhaustion and accumulated punishment.

    His only chances and moments would come on the inside while trying to land hooks or uppercuts while Fury is mauling him...but Fury is likely too smart to get caught while in that position, as he excels at in-fighting.

    Fury is too damn big and smart to lose this one. Respect to Huck though - he's a warrior - but this is not a fair fight for him IMO.
     
  2. Hercegovac

    Hercegovac Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,583
    98
    Oct 19, 2010
    The site has a very real problem with revisionist history :lol:

    Chisora just plods forward, awkwardly ducks, and throws slow slapping hooks. Before Vit and Haye cracked him, he was very tough, had a great chin, and was relentless, and imo was a legit contender, but not anymore.

    Either way, Huck is the quicker of the two, just look up their respective fights and you'll see that yourself, it's not even close.
     
  3. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,153
    39,647
    Sep 29, 2012
    Dino is hyping Chisora and to a lesser extent Hammer for very obvious reasons. Most regulars see through this idiots transparent posting no problem.
     
    Todd498 likes this.
  4. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,282
    23,998
    Jul 21, 2012
    Huck is as flat footed as they come. He was never as fast footed as Chisora. Go watch the fights cos its clear you never have.
     
  5. Hercegovac

    Hercegovac Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,583
    98
    Oct 19, 2010
    Ok whatever you say

    You're probably just ****ed because Huck batter your one good CW in Afolabi half a dozen times
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,282
    23,998
    Jul 21, 2012
    I have nothing against Huck. He fights in spurts and is very flat footed.
    He doesn't apply pressure like Chisora did. It is what it is.
     
  7. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,144
    Apr 4, 2012
    Huck is a great fighter, don't want to speak ill of him.
     
  8. PRINC£

    PRINC£ Guest

    You think Huck would beat Chisora? :lol: Chisora smashes Plodetkin as well
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,551
    83,404
    Nov 30, 2006
    ...for Huck or Fury?
     
  10. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,466
    241,108
    Nov 23, 2013
    Styles make fights *******, old decrepit Wlad proved the terrible performance against Jennings wasn't just an anomaly, and Fury's cowardly p**s poor performance that was built on fear more than some strategically laid out master game plan was anything but impressive. Wlad was terrified of getting countered by Tyson just like he was against Jennings so he didn't throw a damn thing. Put Tyson on there with a live body that isn't some shot shell of a former ATG, or some washed up average bum that was KTFO by Haye in 5 rounds, something your lover couldn't do in 2 fights legitimately.

    Huck is a far more difficult style match up for Fury than the current timid as hell Wlad.

    As far as no life goes, that's rich coming from a guy so obsessed with Wladimir Klitschko that you're willing to sit on a website like a stark raving maniac for hours on end arguing and throwing childish insults like a tough guy over the web, you're a piece of garbage and the biggest loser on this site. You're actually sad. At least I have an excuse for why my life isn't going great, what's yours.
     
    Todd498 likes this.
  11. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,466
    241,108
    Nov 23, 2013
    You know what I was talking about lep, don't act stupid. There's a difference in using a massive weight advantage, since he was a huge lardass to his benefit, to hang on someone and wear them out while they lug his fatass around for the whole fight, and to use your reach and height advantages as a retreating counter puncher.
     
  12. TheFonz9

    TheFonz9 Active Member Full Member

    730
    0
    Aug 13, 2013
    Fury wins everyday, an twice on a sunday.

    Bellew beats Huck ffs
     
  13. turnip

    turnip Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,115
    39
    Oct 19, 2015
    This would be easy money for fury.Huck would not make a decent sparing partner.easy to hit barwler fights in bursts leading with his chin.good fun to watch but should stay away from the HW s or it will end badly.
     
  14. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,282
    23,998
    Jul 21, 2012
    You don't know anything about styles. What win has Huck on his record which proves he matches up favourably to Fury?

    Whats the excuse for his terrible performances against Iggy and Peters and his KO losses to Brewster and Sanders?
    He fought Haye exactly like he fought Fury. Afraid of the counter.
    You haven't got a clue about Klitschko. Not one iota.
    He represents something to you and it has nothing to do with the sport of boxing.
    Yeah , putting his hands behind his back and taunting Wlad is a pure sign of fear:nut
    No , that fear was ingrained inside him after Williamson floored him back in 2004.
    Anybody with the most basic knowledge on the sport has major issues with counter punching movers.
    Wlad of the Fury fight would have put Huck into a coma. Fury beat a Wlad that was unbeaten in 10 years , who had just destroyed the #1 Pulev. You post like a little child.
    Huck just got destroyed by a southpaw half the size with barely a quarter of the skills as Fury.
    He won no more than 4 rounds against A 40 year old Arslan in one of the biggest robbery's of recent years.
    He was ripped with uppercuts all night. One of Furys best shots.
    The guy has zero defence. Is an open target. Plods forward. Fights in spots.
    He hasn't the reach , work rate , size , power , speed , skills , stamina to be the slightest bit competitive with Fury.

    If Wlad approached Fury as recklessly as Huck would, he would have been laid out. Wlad knew it. He is a much smarter fighter than Huck. Tactically and defensively he is on another level. His footwork is far superior and he is lighter on his feet. His punching is more accurate , precise and powerful. Fury defused all that with footwork, feints and upper body movement the division hasn't seen since the 90's.


    Explain exactly how Huck is a bad match -up for Fury?
     
  15. PRINC£

    PRINC£ Guest

    I feel sorry for anyone that genuinely thinks even a 'prime' Huck has a remote chance against Tyson Fury. They literally know nothing about the sport of boxing.