Mares vs Gary Rusell JR next!!! Who u got

You got butter or cheese on that?

 

I've said this many times stupid people are easy to read. When people come at me, the first thing I think is what is their agenda. It was blatantly obvious that his agenda is to discredit black fighters, and he thought I was criticizing Loma so he was upset about my post. I called him out on this before I even looked at his post history. I mean just look at what I copy pasted that's on the front page, it basically says EVERYTHING I accused him of LOL.

From J-rock getting beat, to Burton getting stopped in 12th you guys might as well call my mystic mac from now on. I can predict and read situations too well. I did get the Mares/Cuellar fight wrong though lol.

 

I have not posted excessively over GG. I am a fan yes. Nor is GG like Loma a part of the OP. I haven't discredited fighters I feel aren't open to it. Wilder, Ward Imo are....

I have been more than complimentary to the Walters, Joshua's & Crawford's of the world & I recently discussed p4p and included many black fighters and nor is Chocolate toast who I consider p4p # 1 white. You copy & pasted my post history to the thread bro hahahaha talk about overkill or melodramatic LMAO Hahahaha we are laughing

 

It's all about the butta baby!

 

So where are your posts discrediting GGG? Do you think he should be discredited or criticized? The post you had about GGG in your recent postswas a post defending him and trying to criticize Hagler. You'd think that you'd criticize GGG since there is a lot of things to criticize him for.

I mean I'd have to take your word on that, I'm not going to bother digging deeper into your post history, but the first page of your recent posting is extremely telling of what kind fo poster you are. You say it's overkill and melodramatic, what, exposing you for something I accused you of before I even checked your post history is overkill? Something that takes literally less than 10 seconds to do is overkill? Ok. Sure.
Keep laughing at the fact that before I even checked your post history I could read you like a book. I knew you would have posts defending GGG, and posts criticizing top black boxers. Where are all fo your posts criticizing top white ones? Hmm?

 

Yes so mystic in fact u telepathically sent your answer (before the racial paranoid episode) to someone else because I am yet you ascertain why you immediately & automatically thought Lomachenko? Is he niggling at you?

 

Simple, I rate Lomachenko top 5 p4p, and I think he's the best from 126-135, and I rate his win over GRJ extremely high. However if GRJ lost to Mares, that win would not be rated as hihg for me. Loma is one of my favorite boxers, as is Usyk. You were unaware of these things, if you were aware, you wouldn't have came at me. You assumed that I'm a poster like you where all I do is criticize top white boxers, when I do that to both sides. Read my tag, I'm esb's most unbiased poster.

See if I was like you, I'd do the same thing you did with J-Rock when Loma beat Russell. Just like J-Rock a lot of hipsters were picking Russell. Russell had not fought anyone at that time, and was just as known as j-rock. Instead of playing stupid and trying to annoy Loma fans, I gave him his due.

 

Golovkin again? Yes Golovkin is open to criticism & rightly so.. In fact I'll start seen as u took us down tangent street. Golovkin should apologize for what he did to Stevens & Brook. It was racist..

Nor was I criticising Hagler. Highlighting a point that's all. Take it how u will. It's fact!

 

So where are your posts criticizing him, link me to them. He's open to right, so just like Ward/Wilder, you criticize him all the time right? Exactly.

And actually that's not fact, I'd rate his win over Hearns over Duran.

 

Oh right, do u not think you have just had a slight over reaction before we got to this point? That would have sufficed initially. Slightly irrational response retrospect u paranoid fruit lol

 

Not at all. I could tell by your first response that you had an agenda, and I felt like exposing you for it. See if you just quoted me once, and didnt try to annoy me and start an argument I probably would have just gave you that response. But you were in another thread trying to provoke an argument or annoy me. Not paranoid at all, I mean I basically proved everything I said LOL. All someone has to do is click your profile and see your most recent posts, you dont even need to dig, almost EVERY post is discrediting a black fighter, or insulting them. Btw you still haven't answered you said you only criticize those who deserve it right? So where are all fo your posts criticizing GGG.

 

That's because you are an irrational unreasonable nutcase. Look at there careers overall... Duran beat SRL, Barkley & pushed Hagler to the brink. Hearns lost to all 3 but beat Duran. Overall I consider Duran a greater p4p fighter and a greater fighter historically especially if one considers he didn't have the physical gifts in terms of stature etc that Hearns had, being much smaller. Duran >Hearns historically... Either way he's at least in Haglers top 2. So we are splitting hairs. As I said it is FACT! Now read that back to me so I can make sure u understand bwahaha

 

I rate the win higher because Hearns was way bigger than Duran. Yes Duran had the more impressive resume, but you said it yourself you are an irrational unreasonable nutcase, so weight is irrelevant to you. I never disagreed that Duran is better than hearns in the ATG list, but I think a win over Hearns at 160 is better than a win over Duran at 160.

Btw you keep avoiding my question LOL. Where are all your posts criticizing top white fighters? Surely a lot of them deserve to be criticized too right? Maybe I'm wrong, maybe you do all the time, but the first page of your most recent comments tells me that's highly unlikely LOL?

 

I'd go with GRJ. GRJ has some entertaining fights left right and centre at FW.
LSC, Frampton, Mares, Selby and Valdez.