Yes I guess to an extent. But the main factor is what the boxer is actually doing. And I also exaggerate when I say hate, I don't hate GGG nor do I hate Floyd then, I just felt like people were being unreasonable so I called them out for it. Actually unlike you I don't spend my time defending floyd like you do GGG. Do you know why? Because just like how you defend GGG it makes people hate him more. I try to stay away from Floyd topics. Yes, I'm definitely a Floyd fanboy, but I'm also ESB's most unbiased poster. I criticized Floyd for fighting Berto an opponent better than almost every GGG has fought.
Btw I bet you if you ask most people on here if I'm fair and unbiased unless I'm just trolling around trying to trigger white power posters, I think most would tell you I give everyone a fair shake regardless of color, or nationality. My top 10 favorite boxers has white people, asians, mexicans, etc.
You are a weirdo though. Who asks the same questions in the same post. That's some autistic like behavior, or you're just getting really worked up. You only have to ask it once. Do I duck your questions like you do? No, I don't.
Why are you calibrating this type of stuff in the first place instead of just talking boxing? Does it take one to know one?
I do talk boxing, just not with people like you who CLEARLY have an agenda. There are tons of people on here I talk boxing with, Reg, CST, Drenlou, Serge, etc.
I unlike you don't think most posters care about you enough. Get over yourself, these people aren't your friends.... Do u think they are your ickle friends? Lol
What are you even going on about. Who said that I think they're friends, or they consider me friends. I just talk boxing with them because they don't have an agenda like you do. When I stumble across some weirdo autist who tries to get my attention and provoke a fight, why would I talk boxing? I mean whenever I stumble across some weirdo like you I just check their post history, and basically everything I assume about them before they even go full ****** and spout their bias is right there.
Did I not answer this question already you weirdo autist. Yes I spent 10 seconds copy pasting the first page of your most recent posts to prove that you're exactly what I thought you were. You going to ask the same question for the 100th time I like how you're trying to ask me rhetorical questions to try and prove something that I keep shutting down.
Try chronology mate.. I initiated a conversation with you about boxing. You immediately went into spaz mode & went on a tirade about race & stalking. It was YOU who digressed from the topic. **** me you're dense...
No you didn't. You initiated a conversation with me trying to annoy me by saying that J-Rock is a nobody, which implies Charlo gets no credit. What was your intention of your post? What were you trying to get out of it? Then within 15 minutes you quoted me on another post this time getting all butthurt because you thought I was criticizing Lomachenko. So it was pretty obvious that you were a poster with an agenda. Digressed from what topic? If you actually go to the first page, I explained to CST why I brought lomachenko up. You just chose not to read it.
Yes because going around quoting someone twice within 15 minutes trying to start something up isn't stalkerish, but spending under 10 seconds to expose someone and their agenda that you predicted is. Gotchu!